|
include("http://www.corante.com/goyami/sidebar.php"); ?>
|

Category Archives
! Hot Topics
|
AdSense Tips
»
January 05, 2006

Posted by Adam Viener
You may or may not have heard the press recently regarding this site, but I just had the chance to take a look at it, and have to say. Wow, brilliant!
Alex Tew is a 21 year old college student in Wiltshire England who didn't want to graduate with student loan debt, so he decided to create a "Million Dollar Home Page". His idea was to take 1,000,000 pixels and sell them for $1 each in blocks of 10x10 pixels.
Well with some PR boost, the site has taken off. The viral marketing and inbound links, like this one have boosted the site to a PR7 ranking in Google, and the honor of Alexa's fasted moving site.
The last 1,000 pixels are available on eBay, and as of this post are selling for $146,700 with 5 days and 21 hours left.
Brilliant!

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
If you have been reading Goyami over the past year or so, you know I love all of these holiday Google logos. Today I stumbled across a few Google logo sites that I wanted to share:
Google's Official Holiday Loog Page
Google's Official Fan Logo Page
Logoogle.com - Fake Google Logos
Here are some of my favorites:




Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 04, 2006

Posted by Adam Viener
Google Celebrates the Birth of Louis Braille today with a special Braille Logo:

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 01, 2006

Posted by Adam Viener
Happy New Years everyone! Welcome to 2006. We hope your 2005 was profitable, and look forward to keeping you up to date on the new changes in the search / affiliate world in 2006. This year should be interesting, I think we will see a lot more of MSN Search this year, which should finally complete the "mi" part of Goyami. Gooogle, Yahoo, and Microsoft.
Here are this years festive 2006 logos.



Click here for logos from Prior years:
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 25, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Just a quick note of thanks on this wonderful Christmas day. This year has been great, and one of the things that made this year great is the great working relationships with some great affiliate managers. Again this year, the out-poring of thoughts, emails, cards, and gifts has been great and much appreciated.
In Goyami tradition, here are this year’s special Christmas logos:








And also in keeping with Goyami Christmas tradition, some special pr5 links to some of our valued partners who took special time to send holiday gifts this year:
Shawn Collins of AffiliateTip.com and his outsourced affiliate program management consulting services site.
Andrea Harris and Todd Krvtich, of the Carfax affiliate program. The premeir affiliate program for used vehicle history reports.
Phillip Kidwell and Irene Shih of the eHealthInsurance affiliate program. The #1 health insurance affiliate program.
Beth Kirsch and Jeff Gordan of the LowerMyBills.com afiliate program. The best run mortgage and lending affiliate program.
Chad Darling, Jonathan Moura, and the rest of the gang at Commission Junction. The leading affiliate network, and a great affiliate management team.
The Google Adwords and Google Adsense gang. As always, thanks for the great service and wonderful Christmas gifts.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 30, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
comScore has released Cyber-Monday Stats. Sales this year were $451 Million up 17% over last year. 55% of Black Monday (or Cyber Monday) sales were generated by consumers at work.
Gian Filgoni, chariman and co-founder of comScore notes that even though there was a lot of media hype over CyberMonday this year, this day was actually the 12th busiest day of the holiday season last year. "Peak sales actually occurred in mid-December as consumers scrambled to take advantage of the late-season discounts and free-shipping offers"
I sure hope the media continues to stir up stories of top selling online shopping days. Maybe we can have a CyberWeekend soon! Maybe every Monday in December is Cyber-Monday?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
comScore has released Cyber-Monday Stats. Sales this year were $451 Million up 17% over last year. 55% of Black Monday (or Cyber Monday) sales were generated by consumers at work.
Gian Filgoni, chariman and co-founder of comScore notes that even though there was a lot of media hype over CyberMonday this year, this day was actually the 12th busiest day of the holiday season last year. "Peak sales actually occurred in mid-December as consumers scrambled to take advantage of the late-season discounts and free-shipping offers"
I sure hope the media continues to stir up stories of top selling online shopping days. Maybe we can have a CyberWeekend soon! Maybe every Monday in December is Cyber-Monday?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | ! Hot Topics
November 28, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
The news media is all abuzz about Cyber Monday. They are calling today the biggest online shopping day of the season. Similar to Black Friday (the day after Thanksgiving) where people on holiday head out to the retail stores, today is the day people get back to "work", and start shopping online.
According to comScroe Networks, consumer online spending will be up 24% this year.
Many online retailers are starting to extend their thanksgiving deals to include Monday. Cyber Monday Deals can be found on most major retailer sites and on coupon code websites.
So, what are people buying this year?
The New XBox 360 is making a lot of buzz (see News4Xbox.com) and the Apple iPod Nano are making a lot of buzz too (see News4iPod.com)
Visit 10BestSelling.net for more best selling products in various categories. (Everything from Gadgets and Shoes, to Toys and Baby Gifts)
Happy Cyber Monday!
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 24, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Happy Thanksgiving everyone. I hope everyone has a happy, healthy and profitable holiday season. I have heard in the news lately that they are calling the monday after thanksgiving "Black Monday" for online shopping because everyone goes back to work and does their online shopping from their broadband connections at work.
Here are this years thanksgiving day logos. (still nothing creative from msn):



And previous years:




Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 15, 2005

Posted by Todd Tweedy
Search engines don't have customer. Search engines have users. Right?
Maybe that was the case in 1998. Today search engines have become ad-support platforms that fund the creation of other software, services and acquisitions. As long as the ad model is working the cash keeps flowing. Well, what happens when people get sick of seeing text-based ad units everywhere they go online?
How do you protect the Golden Google Goose? Well, instead of trying to tactically create a model to boost adoption of new products through limited trial use, ad-monetized or some other restriction or limitation why not simply become THE adoption model?
I believe that's what Google did by introducing Gmail, and is now taking another step to really deepen relationships with webmasters and site owners with the introduction of free web Google Analytics.
Google already has a wonderfully designed product and more importanly the trust of customers using the product. Keep the TRUST and you keep the customer coming in who want to adopt anything you put in front of them.
Urchin today. Perhaps web hosting tomorrow. Watch out web hosting firms. Google just took away one revenue stream: selling hosting customers stats packages.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 09, 2005

Posted by Todd Tweedy
The recent Microsoft leak of documents that went out to top Mixcrosoft execs before last week's Live announcement is revealing -- very revealing.
Of great personal interest was the Key Tenets in the Ray Ozzie document. I suggest reading the Advertising-Supported Economic Model and the effectiveness of a new delivery and adoption model.
These frameworks are valuable from the persepective of developing compelling messaging that will be oh so imporantant to conversions as we ramp up for Q4.
On a personal note -- I've been crazy busy launching a new company and trying to put the final -- I keep telling myself that -- touches on a specifications doc so that developement can begin on a new search tool that addresses many of the profile elements raised in Google's recent Bourbon Index update/patent filing. The tool also is interesting from the standpoint of looking at static vs. dyanmic content and URLs and logical navigation relationships between internal links from page to page as well as rating the inbound links to a page in terms of relevancy to a choosen keyword phrase. The thing I like most -- that I feel will be critical -- is the archiving feature. Fingers crossed!!!
All the best,
Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 27, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Many have emailed me regading my posting about Schoolpop declaring bankruptcy. Here is a letter that was sent to me by one of our readers / fans, they received the following from Katie Scott, Schoolpop's Director of Sales and Service:

I apologize for the confusion that has occurred as to the status of Schoolpop. Here is a recap of the events that have occurred since Labor Day: On September 13th, Schoolpop did in fact file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and at that time, all of the employees, myself included were let go. Last week, the trustee handling the case contacted myself and a few others asking us to begin to communicate again with our Champions and Supporters regarding the now evident potential sale that is pending.
We have been asked to come back aboard and maintain the business until the sale is final and the new company will acquire Schoolpop's assets and programs. As the Director of Sales & Service, my intention is to make sure that every Schoolpop supporters' contributions are accounted for and recorded so that in the likely event of the sale, that the schools and NPO's receive their contribution checks. I encourage you to continue to promote the online shopping and Visa as we still have relationships with the vendor and Chase Bank and are maintaining those because we believe a sale will occur shortly. As far as the refunds due from the Supply program, I have personally recorded all refunds due and the trustee and court has this information so that once the sale occurs and the freeze has been lifted on any monies, these refunds can be expedited and sent out.
Again, I apologize for any confusion, that was not my intent, I want to make sure that our Champions & Supporters are aware of what is happening here so that at the conclusion of a sale, that the transition is smooth and without incidence.
Regards, Katie Scott Director of Sales & Service
Comments (7)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 20, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Google can't afford to allow Microsoft to buy AOL from Time Warner. The Google AOL partnership currently provides $380 million dollars a year for Google. The recent stories of the Microsoft / AOL dealings have to scare Google.
The length of the initial AOL-Google deal was never announced, but it was renewed 17 months later, in October 2003. Assuming that deal was for 2 or 3 years, it's time for renewal either one month from now, or one year from now.
Having this inside knowledge of what was about to happen in the landscape of search suggests why now was the right time for Google to do a $4 billion secondary offering at $295 a share.
Google is also looking to play in the Internet access game, see http://wifi.google.com/faq.html and http://wifi.google.com/download.html.
Picking up AOL at this time seems like a necessary step to secure Google's advertising growth. They simply can't afford to let Microsoft steal AOL from their grasp.
A Microsoft Purchase of AOL will have significant regulatory hurdles with in the Instant Messaging Space. This would be a difficult path for Time Warner, and ultimatly might not be approved.
The AOL culture has an ingrained hatred of Microsoft from the early days, although the culture has changed signficantly as the old guard has been purged from AOL, I think the culture clash would be signfigant.
I think it's clear that Google should, will, and must acquire AOL at this time.
We look forward to welcoming Google to Northern Virginia.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 14, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
After my recent entry about Geico suing competitors for bidding on their trademark as keywords, Hendry Lee of Marketingloop.com took issue with my analogy of a customer going to BestBuy and "searching" for Sony TVs. His issue was that this is an apples to oranges comparison because of the offline vs online world, and that BestBuy's sales people have an obligation to sell as best they can for the company.
While I agree that this is offline, I think the main issue here and in the case of trademark violations in general is if it is causing customer confusion and or dilution of the trademark.
While, I too am not a lawyer, I find it hard to believe that if someone does a search for the keyword "Geico" and sees and ad for Screentrade Car Insurance. It's clearly a competitor.
I am not sure how the courts will fall on this issue, but my gut tells me that bidding on a keyword should be considered fair use, so long as the ad doesn't cause confusion as to who the ad is for.
It would appear, at least in the US, that Google agrees, as this is their current policy.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 13, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
After settling their case with Google, Geico has decided to start going after companies buying their trademarked keywords. Apparently, if they can't get Google and Overture to block competitors from buying their keyword terms, they feel they will have better luck going after their competitors.
I just ran a search for Geico, and came up with only one ad under their trademark:
Car Insurance Free Quote
Fill out a quick form and get up to
3 quotes from leading companies.
www.quoteserv.com
I guess QuoteServ.com will be getting a cease and desist letter soon. It's an interesting argument; does someone seeing the ad above think this is a Geico ad? I am not sure there is confusion.
If I walk into BestBuy and tell them I want to see their Sony TV's, will I not see Zenith TV's right next to them? I was clearly searching for Sony TV's, yet I see the Zenith, and am not confused that it's a Sony. Why are keyword searches any different?
If I typed in Geico as a keyword, and the ad said Geico Car Insurance, and I clicked on the ad an went to a competitor that would be a clear violation and confusion, but running a competitive ad when someone searches for a competitor's name, seems fair game.
It will be interesting to see if any of these cases actually make it to judgment.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 12, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
eBay announced today that it will purchase Skype for $4.1 Billion. Skype is a rapidly growing free internet phone service. With this announcement and Google latest push into voice over IP with their Google Talk program we are starting to see a trend that could have significant impact on how people conduct business on the Internet.
With Google and eBay firmly behind these technologies, it won't be long before single click options appear on pages to allow customers to "call" companies for free over the Internet. Virtual call centers for accepting Skype and Google Talk calls will start popping up and orders that might need some extra hand-holding will begin to move from traditional phones to internet phones, saving customers and companies significant money.
I am sure eBay will be quick to add features that allow bidders to contact sellers in this fashion.
For the affiliate industry, it becomes even more imperative for merchants to come up with ways to track affiliate commissions from the click to the phone order no matter if it ends up on traditional land lines or VOIP.
It will be interesting to watch and see how fast these technologies become mainstream for internet merchants and customers...
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 08, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Google and Geico have agreed to settle the lawsuit brought by Geico claming that Google infringed on their trademarks by allowing people to bid on the term Geico. Terms of the agreement were not released.
In December, a federal judge ruled in Google's favor indicating that bidding on competitive trademark terms alone was not a violation. This spurred Google's change in their trademark policies, in the US, to stop disallowing trademark keywords, but instead focus on disallowing trademarks in advertising copy. Google will still disallow some trademark terms on ads that are run in other countries (or set to run globally).
Since Google already had a ruling against it, a settlement at this time, indicates that Google probably had appealed the case, and both sides have decided to stop paying the lawyers at this time.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 07, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Management at Schoolpop has informed it's employees that they plan to file for chapter 7 bankruptcy this week. The schoolpop website is likely to be down within the next week or so, and management is attempting to sell Schoolpop's business units during the bankruptcy process.
Schoolpop was a loyalty program that let's people shop to earn cash for their children's school's. Schoolpop had long been touted in the affiliate industry as a shining star and an example of combining social good with affiliate marketing.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (1) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 01, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Source: comScore Networks
Not surprisingly, the devastation caused by Katrina brought a virtual halt to online connectivity in cities hit by the storm.
- On the average weekday in the week preceding the storm, approximately 700,000 people used the Internet in New Orleans. On Monday, August 29, that number dropped more than 80 percent below that level. By the following day that decline had reached 90 percent.
- In the Biloxi-Gulfport area, Internet traffic exceeded 160,000 users on the average weekday during the preceding week. On August 29, that number fell by more than 75 percent, and by the following day online activity had fallen below reportable levels.
- The number of Americans offering a helping hand is evidenced by soaring traffic to RedCross.org. On August 31, nearly 1 million people visited the site, more than 32 times the average number of daily visitors from August 22-26.
- Americans turned to the Internet for the latest weather information as the storm approached. WeatherBug drew more than 9.9 million visitors on August 29th, while The Weather Channel (weather.com) saw 9 million visitors on August 29.
- More than 1.7 million online searches were conducted on August 29 containing the words "Hurricane" and/or "Katrina," a more than tenfold increase over the daily average of 143,000 searches during the five days ending August 26, 2005.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
Hurricane Katrina has caused havoc in New Orleans and surrounding areas. You can help do your part to support the Red Cross' relief effort by posting ads (like the ones bellow) to your web sites. They have ads available in many sizes, and you can get your ads from the following site:
http://www.redcross.org/psa/bannerorder/all/

Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
August 02, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
A quick search of the Wordtracker top 30 keywords for the day indicated a term I had never heard of, Googletestad. Why would so many people be looking for Googletestad, I wondered. So I started doing a little research, and to be honest I didn't learn much. I think Google may be testing something with this term.
When you do a search for Googletestad on Google you will sometimes see the following top paid search ad:
Congratulations!
This is a family save ad.
All systems are go!
www.google.com
It would appear that Googletestad actually stands for Google's Test Ad, and is used to test their adwords system in the live production environment.
So why is this showing up in the top 10 current keywords? Google must be running some massive traffic tests.
Any thoughts?
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
July 28, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
I received the following error message this morning when trying to do a search from the Google toolbar:
We're sorry...
... but we can't process your request right now. A computer virus or spyware application is sending us automated requests, and it appears that your computer or network has been infected.
We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the meantime, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that your computer is free of viruses and other spurious software.
We apologize for the inconvenience, and hope we'll see you again on Google.
View Screenshot
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
July 20, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
On July 20, 1969, after a four day trip, the Apollo 11 astronauts arrived at the Moon. At 10:56 pm EDT on July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong became the first human to set foot on the Moon.
One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind, and one more logo opportunity for Google...

Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
July 15, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Google announced pending changes to their adwords platform and keyword bidding policies today. We are tentatively optimistic about these changes. On one hand we should see a better opportunity to keep keywords running, on the other we are concerned about forced increases in costs per click across the board. Here is the meat of their announcement and some answers to some clarifying questions:
Google's Announcement:
What's changing
- Simplified account management: Your keywords will be active or inactive instead of normal, in trial, on hold, and disabled. In addition, accounts will no longer be slowed. Currently, accounts are slowed when they don't meet our performance requirements and your ads appear rarely for your keywords.
- Quality-based minimum bids: Soon, each keyword will be assigned a minimum bid based on its Quality Score. Keywords with a higher Quality Score will be given lower minimum bids to stay active and trigger ads. Keywords with a lower Quality Score (including those that are currently on hold) will have the opportunity to run if your keyword or Ad Group's maximum cost-per-click (CPC) meets the minimum bid.
- The Quality Score is determined by your keyword's clickthrough rate (CTR), relevance of your ad text, historical keyword performance, and other relevancy factors.
- Ad Rank, or the position of your ad, will continue to be based on the maximum CPC and quality (now called the Quality Score).
Questions for Google:
Goyami:
Do you have a more specific target date for implementation?
Google:
Google has not set a specific launch date for this change to the AdWords system. The announcement indicates sometime in the next few weeks. We will notify you as soon as we have an update on the target date.
Goyami:
It says that keywords will be assigned a minimum bid based on it's
quality score. What is the range of minimum bids and where will we be able to see these bids?
Google:
The current range of bidding possible within the AdWords system is $0.05-$100. With this upcoming change, the minimum CPC will be reduced to $0.01, and therefore the possible CPC range for AdWords will be $0.01-$100.
Goyami:
When a keywords in deactivated, what is the process to re-activate?
Will the interface display how much you need to bid to display this ad?
Google:
After we determine your quality-based minimum bid, your keywords will fall into one of two states: active or inactive. If your keyword or Ad Group's maximum CPC meets the minimum bid assigned to it, your ad will remain active. If it doesn't, your keyword will be inactive. Our interface will show the minimum CPC required to reach an active status for specific keywords.
Goyami:
Can you explain in more detail how the Quality Score is calculated?
Google:
The quality score is the most important factor we use to determine your keyword's performance and ad's position on a search page in the Google Network. Your Quality Score is determined by your keyword's clickthrough rate (CTR), relevance of your ad text, historical keyword performance, and other relevancy factors. The first 3 factors mentioned will be weighed heaviest in determining ad positioning.
Goyami:
In the past you have looked at how others performed on specific
keywords to decide if terms should be placed on hold, will these new rules apply only to my individual account and performance on the specified keyword?
Google:
The keyword statuses normal, in trial, on hold, slowed, and disabled will be replaced with active (triggering ads) and inactive (not triggering ads). In addition, accounts will no longer be slowed. Currently, accounts are slowed when they don't meet our performance requirements. The historical keyword performance is one of the factors and this will incorporate historical performance for your specific account on a keyword as well as the overall historical performance of that term.
We will keep you posted as we learn more, also let us know if you have any additional questions / concerns for Google.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | PPC Search Engine Marketing | Pay Per Click Management Tools
July 04, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Happy 4th of July. Is Google losing their touch? No 4th of July logo today! Here is Yahoo's 4th of July fireworks logo and some of Google's logos from previous years:




Update: Looks like I spoke too soon. Perhaps the Google guys read my entry, but I check again this afternoon and they now have the following logo for 2005 published:

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
June 08, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Last week eBay announced they will purchase Shopping.com for $620 million in cash. Shopping.com is a comparison shopping and customer review site that went public in October of 2004 at $18 per share. The buyout places a 20% premium on Shopping.com's current valuation.
This week, Scripps announced it would acquire Shopzilla (formerly Bizrate).
David Lewis posted an excellent review of the industry and scorecard and predicts that Experian will by Pricegrabber as the price comparison site industry continues to consolidate.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
Google has an ongoing tradition of commerating famous artists birthdays with their own special logos. Today, Google is celbrating the birtday of Frank Lloyd Wright. Here is their logo:

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
June 02, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Goyami has come a long way this year, and as we continue to grow and exapand our audience we are asking for your help. ClickZ has opened up nominations for their 2005 Marketing Excellence Award. We would appreciate your support for the Best Business/Marketing Blog.
To nominate Goyami please follow these directions:
- Click on this Nomination Link
- Check off "Best Business/Marketing Blog" under the Blog section.
- Enter "Goyami" as the Nominee Name
- Enter "http://www.corante.com/goyami" as the url
- Enter your own reason for nomination
- Optionally include your name and email address.
Thank you in advance, we really appreciate your readership and your support!
Adam & Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
May 31, 2005

Posted by Todd Tweedy
Its difficult to believe the tantalizing list of scandalous topics being presented as fact by a blogger claiming to be an Open Directory Project (ODP) editor Ana Thema. Regardless, the blog - http://www.corruptdmozeditor.com is generating lots of unwanted attention for ODP also known as DMoz (for Directory.Mozilla) an open content directory of the Web that has been maintained and by volunteers of trusted human editors. Trust that is until now.
Topics on the "tell all" blog include:
** How to Bribe a DMOZ Editor
** Corruption is Rampant - Get Yours or Get Out
** DMOZ Editors Are Laughing at Your Submissions Behind Closed Doors
** Sabotaging a Competitors DMOZ Listing for Fun & Profit
The Open Directory Project is run by Time-Warner's AOL's Netscape division. Representatives from the company were unavailable for comment. (Note: Not surprising. This blogger isn't listed in the DMOZ profiles, references screenname that are also not in the profile and, to characterize all DMOZ editors in this negative light is simply unfair.)
The blog itself was set up in December of last year, and has a small pool of posts. A recent post with screenshots from DMOZ's internal message board Penguin Cafe -- a message board community launched in June 2000 and labeled "a new social club forum" for editors -- appears to be fueling concerns that DMOZ editors are not treating webmasters fairly that submit sites for review. I believe the post takes the messages from the board out of context to justify any supposed wrongdoings at DMOZ.
If anything, the news of this blog is likely to force the adoption of new message board rules for posting so that potential conflicts are avoided in the future.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
May 24, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
A California judge recently declared a mistrial in the recent patent-infringement case between Yahoo and Findwhat. Yahoo has sued Findwhat testing Overture's original patent for search engine keyword advertising.
Yahoo / Overture's patent specifically targets the ability for advertisers to bid specific prices for specific rankings in search engines. Google side steps the patent with their Adrank formula which determines rank by bid price and click through rates. Findwhat however, uses overture's same model and is thereby at potential risk in this case.
After 3 years in the legal system already, The jury was hung, and the industry will have to wait for a future decision on this case. The next court date is scheduled for June 24th. Don't hold your breath for a quick resolution here; things can take a long time in our legal system.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
May 11, 2005

Posted by Todd Tweedy
GoYaMi has learned that Vinny Linghams development team at incuBeta.com will release a vertical search engine tomorrow designed exclusively for shoes. The new search engine presently in beta, ThatShoe.com, is fueled by 17 merchant data feeds and contains hundreds of thousands of products. IncuBeta.com has a reputation for developing customized PPC and organic sites to support their merchant relationships.
In a written statement, Lingham noted, "We created a one-stop-shop for consumers looking for shoes. It is quick and easy to use, unlike clicking through directories or mostly irrelevant search results. The quality of results is based solely on the merchants' ability to provide quality data feeds." Merchants seeking to partner with incuBeta.com can contact Vinny Lingham at vinny.l@incubeta.com or by phoning +27 21 417 1363.
The vertical search strategy has been evaluated by leading research firms including JupiterMedia and eMarketer.com. The shoe-only search engine platform developed by incuBeta.com is the first, and largest dedicated exclusively to shoes. Merchants on www.thatshoe.com include eBay, Zappos.com, and Amazon.com among others. As of this writing, no additional information is available on future plans to release additional search vertical engines.
Based on information obtained by GoYaMi, the new engine contains four core categories displaying 12, 18 or 24 results per search query. Description content varies by entry with as few as four words to as many 282 per entry. Unique title tags by page appear to be generic at the moment while ThatShoe.com continues with testing and spider simulations revealed as many as 116 links from a single page.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Todd Tweedy
I've started a blog on all things RVing to turn one of my serious loves into some $$$. The blog is called Good RV Turns. Enjoy!
Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
May 08, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Happy Mother's Day everyone! I hope you did well with your affiliate marketing this Mother's Day. I saw on the news that a projected 11.4 billion dollars are spent on Mother's day gifts with the top sellers being a night out to dinner, jewelry, and flowers.
Here is Google's Mother's Day logo as well as the logo I forgot to post for teacher's appreciation day.


Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
April 25, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
In May of 2004, Google launched image ads on their content network, where advertisers could ad image ads in their normal adgroups and they had the "possibility" of showing up in the content network ads.
Today, Google announced that they will expand this feature by allowing advertisers to setup site targeted campaigns that will display image ads on a cost per impression (CPM) basis instead of their standard cost per click. For the first time advertisers will be allowed to specify which sites their ads will appear on. Additionally, Google announced they will start allowing animated images, which had been restricted in the past.
Full details are not yet available, as the service hasn't officially launched. It doesn't appear that Google will be opening this selective targeting option up to their standard PPC content targeted ads.
This move could open up more opportunities for content publishers to earn more money through the Google Adsense.
Google's content network has been affected heavily with click-fraud, causing many advertisers to turn off content networking.
Impression Fraud, where unscrupulous publishers need only generate web traffic to their site, might be even harder for Google's system to police since they won't receive the data typically sent with a click. My guess is that this fear was the main driver of the decision to offer site targeting for these ads. For this reason, I would caution advertisers wanted to run CPM ads to only select high-profile sites that you are familiar with.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
April 21, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
The 80-20 rule is certainly alive and well with keyword advertising. It's true that 20% of your keywords will drive 80% of your volume. The question comes down to identifying the 20% as fast and as efficently as possible.
I have worked with some clients who's search logs indicate the terms people have found them under, and this has often been a great place to start. However this is often only part of the story. If they don't have the specific terms on their site, they haven't been found under them, right?
I agree with Todd, 100% when he says you need to be able to run quick tests to see if a program is going to work before investing the time on extensive keyword research.
Once you have found that great program though, I have been very sucessful in testing large keyword lists as a way to identify the 20% that will drive my volume.
It's getting a lot harder though to run any massive lists for a program, I might have to look at more of a staging approach, launching a large list of quality terms and letting them come off hold before launching the more extensive lists that I have been able to build.
I don't know which approach is best, and certanily I have used both approaches at different times where appropriate. I am sure Todd has as well.
The bottom line is it's getting harder to work with Google in this fashion and that means it's time to adjust to the changing times or advertise elsewhere...
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Todd Tweedy
Adams recent post made me giggle. While I agree with him that Google is experiencing some difficulties in providing advertisers the scalability they may want so that they can run large volumes of keywords it may not always be needed.
Heres an example. A merchant with over 1,000,000 customers had less than 5,000 keyword phrases in their referrer log files for the past year. From this pool of 5,000 phrases, approximately 9% of the terms delivered 85% of all searches. How would an additional 4-million keyword phrases in a paid-search campaign help this merchant generate additional revenue?
My focus is not quantity but quality. Heres a sentence from a long assessment report I provided to a client in the financial services space in November of last year on one ad group containing only 2,200 keyword phrases:
The number of active terms generating a least a single click during the month reached approximately 64%. The keyword phrase xxxx xxx xxxx accounted for 56% of spending for this category and approximately 45% of click volume. During November position 5 was maintained to generate the highest qualified click volume. Bid minimums to reach the next highest position would have required an additional $0.70 per click with position 3 requiring an additional $1.15 or $2.30 per click.
We didnt need millions of keywords, we simply had to take our keyword research and performance data to drill down a level to get plugged into a 3-word phrase that was generating volume and conversions. We also aggregated search volume, and built out a massive keyword list to average down the overall cost per acquisition while still optimizing campaign spending on a keyword level.
A New Paid Search Reality Active Phrases
Im sure the new restrictions limiting the number of keywords per account only demonstrates that growth comes with additional costs, and in Goolges case its the cost of servicing their advertiser base and providing a simple, fast and effective online marketing tool thats reliable and accurate. I believe Googles cap actually hints at the reality of paid-search that is a small pool of terms generate a huge percentage of your traffic. And, yes we are seeing more 2 and 3 as well as 4 word phrases in keyword universes but its the percentage of active terms in that pool that is more important than the number of variations you can artificially create.
Id like to think of myself as a thinking man so if that means Im chasing the thinking end of the search engine beast I can live with that. But heres the important concept to keep in mind if your affiliate strategy is to participate in hundreds of affiliate programs; time is money. As an affiliate you dont have time to conduct detailed keyword research, build out lists into relevant keyword groups, evaluate competitors, develop compelling creative for testing, set up accounts, activate hundreds of programs, plug in performance data for tracking conversions, modify bids, pull underperforming terms, and optimize creative. Lets not even get into the amount of time it takes to keep up on search engine developments as well as the countless hours of wasted time talking to reps from various engines that believe we are simply framing the content of another site on our site and that our site is just duplicated content. I just dont have the time to play around with hundreds of merchant programs. My focus is to identify active phrases.
Start Asking: Is it Alive?
I think you have to be able to answer the question: is this program going to work? And, heres where I believe Adam stepped off on the wrong path; you need to first understand if the beast is alive. Its about taking baby steps. Plus, its knowing if the merchant is going to move you into the highest payouts tiers cause we all know thats where the money is! Before I spend the time building out a massive keyword list of phrases, misspellings, competitor terms, and branded core keywords as well as generics, I need to know if the program is worth the effort and if the merchant is able to convert the targeted traffic I send to them. You start small.
What I mean by alive is how active is a core keyword list (what percentage of your list is generating clicks during a given time period) and what conversion rates are being generating.
A little trip to Nelson County Virginia
Let me take you out to the foothills of Nelson County Virginia for a moment.
My boutique-marketing group is really a lot like Rick Millers saw mill Logs to Lumber. We both provide high-end, handcrafted products using specialized tools to reduce the labor inputs to successfully operate our firms. We dont produce products for the mass market. We dont compete with large retail chains or in my case with large search engine marketing firms. We both love what we do, and most importantly we know before we take on a major engagement whether or not the beast is alive. We both provide value-based pricing that is aligned with the goals of our customer/merchants.
In the affiliate arena, its not that Google is broken, its the balance between advertisers demands and affiliate margins has widened in part to do policy changes on a PPC search engine that was too easy to use and generated lots of cash for affiliates without much heavy lifting. The alignment piece of the equation is just missing. Merchants often view affiliate marketing as just another channel a low-cost acquisition channel. Affiliates simply churn out leads. I mean, come on, other than Commission Junction who really has a business plan on the affiliate side of the playing field that goes beyond making commissions? Loyalty marketers? Maybe. But do you?
Adams strategy has always been to use a big net. Adam feels safe using a large pool of keywords and setting minimum bids so that his cost per clicks produce higher earnings. Adam is the poster child of search arbitrage. And, truth be told he does it better than anyone I know. Its successful but its not a sustainable long-term business model. You can have great months and then again you can take a bath on high-volumes of paid search traffic that simply dont convert.
Its time for affiliates to be more innovative or it will be the affiliate who will be in trouble not Goolge.
Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
April 16, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
I don't usually post deals on Goyami, but this is a limited time offer that I thought our readers would jump on. This weekend only, you can get a free year of web hosting from Globat: Here is the link, act fast!
Globat.com: Limited Time Free Web Hosting Special
Follow-up:
After signing up for this "free deal" I later learn that the fine print says that you only get a refund for the "hosting" fees. They tack on some additional "set-up" fees that actually make this deal not free at all. I cancelled my account and then received a rude phone call from them basically telling me that I should have read the fine print and that they would be refunding the "hosting" fees and not the "set-up" fees.
I wonder if they will still give me my affiliate commission on the setup-fees! Bah!
What a scam. They should call it Web Hosing!!!
I won't ever promote this company again. For more honest hosting options check out one of the following:
1&1 Web Hosting - I personally use them and like that I can host multiple domains off one account without additional fees.
Yahoo! Webhosting Domain name included.
Infinity Host- $6.95/mo. Hosting
iPowerweb Hosting $7.95 - Free Setup
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
April 01, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
After reading Todd's story about Google Gulp, I had to rush right out and try some for myself. It took me a while to track down a supply, I can't reveal where I bought them. I secured a large inventory and will be selling my supply of Google Gulp on ebay.
I also secured exclusive license to the logo for the eastern seaboard of North America, and plan on doing a major push in the summer when the drink comes out of Beta and the auto-drink feature has had all the bugs drained out of it.

After testing the first four flavors currently in Beta, I decided that my favorite was the Sero-Tonic water. There was just something about the other fruity flavors that didn't sit well with the Google plain vanilla design style.

I hear they are working on a promotion where you look under the bottle top for a free $25 coupon code to Google Adwords. One in four lucky winners will receive the top that will automatically send them 50 promotional mailers to sign up for Google Adsense.
Enjoy the drink!
Adam
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Todd Tweedy
New American Search Tradition
In a shocking turn of events for the search engine industry earlier today, a Gardner working for an unnamed senior executive at Google sold the rights to his fruity, yet refreshing drink -- Gardner Gulp -- to the popular search engine company Google. This sale is expected to be a real closer.
In a statement released by the company's gerbil -- Algorithm -- who spins a cylinder to power the engine of all search, Al (that's he wanted me to call him) noted that the company intends to add 100% natural drinkable search stuff to every bottle. "Interesting," I told Al.
After speaking off-the-record to a number of birds located near and around the gardener's beds, they validated Al's story as well as chirped out some important information to the tune of Van Halen's Hot for Teacher. After listening to a few sets and one encore, this reporter believes the undisclosed sales price of the Beta beverage is likely to be sold later today for $1.00 Canadian.
The news of this unbelievable sale nearly crashed Google's gulp vineyard website.
It will be interesting to see how Google's main competitors respond to this limited release beta gulping thingee that has the amazing power to make anyone comprehend search results.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
March 31, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Goyami is celebrating its half year anniversary this month, and what a 6 month's it has been. We have seen a lot of changes in the search engine marketing and affiliate marketing industry. We have also gone from 0 visits to over 9,000 a month!
Thanks Everyone!
Adam & Todd

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
March 30, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Google has agreed to acquire Urchin Software. Urchin is one of the leading Web-Analytics packages, and has spent some time building out ROI tools that enable sites to track both their site visitor's behavior as well as their return on investment of their paid search engine keyword advertising.
This move opens doors for Google to sell AdWords and AdSense to Website owners in Urchin's database, as well as gives them more data as to what is happening after the customer leaves Google.
It is clear that Google is interested in what happens after the click and could signal a future move towards selling ads based on leads and transactions instead of clicks. This could move Google directly into the affiliate marketing business and could explain some of their recent moves that could be considered "affiliate unfriendly".
It will be interesting to watch, what are you thoughts?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
Google has been known to put up new Logos that celebrate special holidays, today they put up a logo celebrating the birthday of Vincent van Gogh. What's next, a new logo every day???

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
March 17, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Happy Saint Patricks Day. Enjoy these cool Google logos...




Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
March 08, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
I just wanted to take a quick moment again to thank everyone who keeps coming back and reading our blog. Goyami continues to see tremendous month over month growth. As you can see by the chart below we had approximately 3,200 visits to our site last month and are on track to do over 6,000 visits this month. So either we have a few very avid readers who are visiting Goyami hundreds of times a day or our thoughts are starting to reach a large audience.
Thanks for your support!
Adam & Todd
Goyamis Editors

Comments (3)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 23, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Misspelled and Expired Domain names that get a lot of traffic are becoming hot commodities. As evidenced by two recent transactions.
First, Marchex has agreed to pay 164.2 Million for Name Development Ltd., which displays keyword advertising across a portfolio of more than 100,000 domains. With domains like careerinfo.com, debts.com, and hardware-update.com.
Name Development Ltd business model has been to buy expiring domains with existing traffic and point them to a parked page provider, like Domainhop and TrafficZ, who are willing to setup a site and pay them on a per-click basis. Companies like Name Development Ltd, use tools such as Popusearch and Mozzle to identify which of the expiring domains have a lot in sites linking to them.
Second, the misspelled domain voyuer.com was auctioned off for $112,100 at Snapnames during it's expiration period. The prior owner of Voyuer.com failed to renew the domain name from Network Solutions for $35, and Network Solutions sent the domain into the snapnames auction service to auction it off during the "grace period", the short amount of time after the customer's expiration date but before it was officially dropped by the Registry. In this process, SnapNames, Network Solutions, and the prior owner of the domain, share in the sales proceeds, with 15-20% of Network Solutions' unspecified portion of the sale going to the original registrant. So assuming that Snapnames shares 50%, the original registrant's percentage could be as high as 10% of the overall transaction, or $11,210 for the domain they didn't think was worth the $35 renewal fee. Not bad, but it might hurt a little knowing they could have sold it for the full $112,100. Of course, Network Solutions prominently spells this all out in schedule A section 14 service agreement that is subject to constant change and takes affect 30 days after posting the change to their site.
As more and more companies find ways to monetize "surfing traffic", expired domain names could be worth more and more. Additionally, creative affiliates should continue to explore possible domains with traffic that might drive sales to your merchant partners.
You can bid up a keyword term all day long, and Google makes more and more money, but a domain name that you purchase can be a long term asset for your company.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 14, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
The Goyami staff would like to wish everyone a very Happy Valentines Day!
In Goyami tradition, we have dug up some of the past Google Valentines day logos:






Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 12, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Tracking keyword trends with tools such as Wordtracker can be interesting. Yesterday I noticed that the top word being searched for was Wisconsin Quarter. A quick search on Google showed that an NPR article indicated that there was a misprint on some Wisconsin Quarters making an undetermined number of them worth up to $500. That's a great return on investment for a quarter.
This should turn into a hot news topic as well as a hot auction item, perfect for online auctions.
In fact, here are some live listings of the current auctions on eBay for Wisconsin Misprint Quarters:
Misprint Wisconsin Quarters Sorted by Ending Date:
Misprint Wisconsin Quarters Sorted by Price:
Comments (6)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 11, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
It has been almost a month since Google new affiliate marketing policy went into place, and I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how some of the merchants have been reacting.
I have seen affiliate managers taking some proactive steps to help their programs continue to thrive. Here are some examples of what I am seeing out there:
Merchant Provided Landing Pages
Many programs are starting to build landing pages for their top affiliate managers, so that their affiliates can host co-branded or private label pages that promote their company's products. Here are some examples of Landing Pages I have seen:
LendingTree (landing page)
eHealthInsurance (co-branded landing page)
LowerMyBills (available in CJ interface)
X10 Security Cameras (private label)
Monster Web Templates (private label with their own site builder tool)
HomeGain Local Real Estate Agent Finder (private label)
Proflowers (available in befree interface)
Affiliate Created Landing Pages
Affiliates have also been proactive in creating landing pages that market multiple companies. Here are some examples of some of the pages I have done, as well as others I have seen:
For-Sale-Now.com - Dynamic Comparison Shopping Site
WineByPost.co.uk - UK Wine Delivery Site
Carfax.Car-History-Reports.com - Carfax History Reports landing page
Loan-Center.us - Top 10 Internet Loan Sites for online Lending and Mortgages
CallAlertReviews.com - Call Alert Reviews and Comparisons
Go-Anywhere-PC-Access.com - GotoMyPC Promotion
Play-Real-Music-Online.com - Real Rhapsody promotion site
Great-ISP-Deals.com - Discount ISP deals and comparison site
AskTheTireGuy.com - TireRack Discount Tires promotion site
Oriental-Rug-Discounts - Rugman Oriental Rug Promotions.
HR Block Taxes landing page.
DealForTravel.com Travel Promotion Site.
Time Sensitive Sites
I have also seen affiliates creating specific sites to market specific holidays or time of year promotions:
Flowers-For-Valentines-Day.com Valentines Day promotions and deals.
Save-on-Christmas-Gifts.com - Christmas Gifts Site
Xmas-Deals.com - Christmas Deals and Promotions
Hallowen-Costume-Sale.com - Halloween Costume Site
HR Block Taxes landing page.
It is great to see affiliates and merchants working together to overcome the current Google policy change.
I am sure I have missed a lot of good examples, please feel free to add a comment to this post and tell us about the other sites you have seen or have created.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 08, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
The Parisian District Court has ruled against Google, saying that Google's allowing competitors to run ads triggered by Louis Vuitton's trademark terms was counterfeiting, unfair competition and misleading advertising. The court has ordered Google to pay Louis Vuitton $250,000 and stop displaying ads for Vuitton's competitors whenever users type in the company's name into the search engine.
Google said it was still considering whether or not to appeal the ruling. "We're studying the ruling," said Google spokesperson Myriam Boublil. "No decision's been taken yet on an appeal." Only a month ago, Google lost a similar case with Le Meridian Hotels, in which the search engine firm was fined $2,550 and ordered to pay costs.
Managing different trademark policies in different countries could prove difficult for Google, and we may see this trigger harder positions on trademark bidding in the US in the near future.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
February 03, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Recent reports indicate that unscrupulous folks in Cyberspace may be using the Google AdWords "feature" of disabling keywords that don't get clicked to their own advantage. By running programs that do a lot of searches on a specific term, they can get their competitor's ads disabled, and allow them to gain top ad positions and lower rates.
This will be an interesting development to watch.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 25, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Yesterday Google and Yahoo each launched Video search. They both take a very different approach. Google's Video Search at video.google.com indexes the closed captioning text of programs they have been archiving since December. Yahoo's video search at video.yahoo.com actually searches for video content that you can display on your PC. but uses the names of the videos rather than the content as the key.
Both are in Beta. It's cool to find videos, and neat to see what was said on TV programs, but it would also be nice to find the programs and play the segment online that referenced the searched terms. It will be interesting to watch where this goes.
As of yet, neither appears to offer sponsorship listings based on the terms searched, but that can't be far away.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 20, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
After a big win for Google on the trademark bidding issue in the US, the France courts have dealt them a blow over seas. A French court has ruled that Google must refrain from using the trademarks of European resort chain Le Meridian Hotels and Resorts to trigger keyword ads.
Google said it would appeal the decision saying it is without merit, but the court gave Google little time to comply.
It will be an ongoing challenge for Google to maintain different policies in different regions. If they keep getting hit overseas, they might need to rethink their policy on a global level for consistency.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 11, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Here are some answers to some frequently asked questions that Google has been receiving regarding their new affiliate policy. Interesting to note how they are now refering to the process of which ads to display as the "affiliate auction".
Goyami: If I have 2 ads in my account: 1 that has the visible URL eBay.com and one with my own domain in the visible URL, what ad will show?
Google: We will continue to pull ads from your account like we always have. This means we pull the Ad Group with the highest Ad Rank. Then we pull one creative from this Ad Group based on your campaign settings -- either we rotate evenly through the ads or we pull the one picked by the auto optimization feature. The one selected creative is then sent to the auction. If it loses the affiliate auction, we do not look for an alternate ad that is not subject to the new affiliate policy.
Goyami: How is my CPC set? Is it based on competing affiliates, even when they are not shown?
Google: The CPC that you pay for the ad click is based only on other ads that are shown. Your bid is not set based on lower ranked affiliate ads.
Goyami: How will my CTR ever have a chance to improve after the change takes place and my ad never gets shown anymore?
Google: Your ad may still show if competing affiliate-advertisers reach their daily budgets. Your ad may also be shown for certain variations of your broad keywords where your ad has traditionally performed better than others. As a last resort, you can increase your maximum CPC to improve its chances of showing.
Do you have any other questions for Google, send them my way and I will pass them on.
Adam
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
January 07, 2005

Posted by Todd Tweedy
I received an email from Shoes.com today about the new Google policy. Heres the first paragraph:
I am sure many of you are aware that Google AdWords has incorporated a new affiliate advertising policy, which will allow only one ad per search query for affiliates and parent companies sharing the same url. This means Shoes.com affiliates will now need to send AdWords clicks to their own websites, rather than directly to Shoes.com. The good news is that we have some excellent free tools for affiliates that can help create great landing pages.
Close but no clogs!
Merchants need to remember that its possible for an affiliate ad to be served in place of your if they have a higher ad rank determined by a combination of your ad's maximum cost-per-click (price) and clickthrough rate (performance).
Todd
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing

Posted by Todd Tweedy
I spoke to Todd Crawford, Vice President of Sales at Commission Junction, earlier this morning about Googles recent announcement to limit the number of displayed PPC ads from a shared URL to a single listing and its likely impact on the affiliate industry.
Crawford is a long-time veteran of affiliate marketing. He was calm, articulate and recounted historical developments during our conversation. Here are a few snippets from our phone conversion:
GoYaMi: What impact do you believe Googles new affiliate policy is likely to have on CJs business?
TC: This is still a wait and see situation. We really dont know just yet how this is going to play out.
GoYaMi: So are you telling me no one is worried about this turn of events at CJ?
TC: Actually, weve run our own internal analysis and, were not too alarmed. There will certainly be affiliates that are impacted by this change. Being in the business as long as we have, we feel there will be an evolution in terms of how affiliates market and generate revenue.
GoYaMi: That sounds fine but only one ad will be displayed and it may not be the affiliates. How do you make money?
TC: Again were run our own analysis and
GoYaMi: Youve mentioned before that ValueClick will always have seat at the table and is strongly advocating for affiliates. Can you tell me how receptive Google was to CJs concerns during meetings and how this change might impact affiliates?
TC: I cant confirm or deny we were involved in any meetings. However, let me just add Google is going to do whatever it thinks is best for its business. Lets just leave it at that.
GoYaMi: When can we expect an announcement from CJ?
TC: Im not leading this effort but I dont believe well be making a public announcement.
GoYaMi: Then what are your plans in terms of communicating with affiliates? What support do you plan to provide?
TC: Im sure well be taking to individual affiliates, and its likely that well produce a best practices guide. I dont head up the affiliate side of business and focus more on working with advertisers.
GoYaMi: Youve seen this space move in many different directions, What actions do you beleive should affiliates be taking now?
TC: Wait and see how this affects you and prepare to build out content sites to support revenue generation. If youre only looking at keyword buys your going to have some serious short term challenges.
GoYaMi: I blogged last year that affiliate data feeds are dead. I believe Googles announced policy will be applied to organic listing. Do you agree that affiliates can no longer successfully use data feeds to market a merchants products and services?
TC: I think using data feeds to spam search engines is dead. There are a number of affiliates who are successfully using data feeds. AdWords technology and the organic side of Googles business are two separate technologies and businesses.
GoYaMi: Do you envision many merchants changing program Terms and Conditions so that merchants can prevent affiliates from securing the only display ad against a core search phase?
TC: I think affiliates should be working closely with affiliate managers to come up with solutions that work for both.
In terms of additionally recommendations, I suggest the following:
· Forecast conversions from existing sites generating impressions and clicks to determine a minimum allowable payout by program
· Contact your affiliate managers or better yet the merchants directly to renegotiate your payouts
· Begin development of text-rich content sites to support organic search listing
· Dont use datafeeds to build out content sites
Good luck its safe to say were all going to be rather busy the next few weeks.
Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing

Posted by Adam Viener
Goyami: When will this actually take affect? I have heard 1/13, is that correct?
Google: This policy change will take effect over the next week or two. As with any large policy change, the roll-out must incorporate many aspects of our business, so time is needed to ensure that everything is set. I'm glad that you received some advance notice to allow you to make any necessary edits to your accounts.
Goyami: "It says "we'll only display one ad per search query for affiliates and parent companies sharing the same URL" Does this mean that there will be two allowed ads, 1 for parent AND one for affiliate, or just 1 total?
Google: We now only display one ad in total for affiliates and parent companies sharing the same URL.
Goyami: Is this per page, so that if there are 2 affiliates 1 would show on page 1 and the other on page 2, or does the lower one just lose out all together?
Google: This is per search query, not per page.
Goyami: Are there any more details you can share? What are your thoughts on how to keep spending the same amount or more with Google under this new policy change?
Google: At this time, I do not have any more information. What's important to keep in mind is that Google looks at two factors to decide which ad to show, CTR and MaxCPC. By improving the quality of your ad and/or raising your MaxCPC, you can increase the chances of your ad showing for any particular query.
Goyami: What if you have multiple ads in your ad group, and one is your old affiliate ad, and one is a new site that you create. Will adwords automatically pick the one with its own site when there is a duplicate higher ranked advertiser for the old affiliate ad?
Google: At this time, we are still exploring how the system may react to this type of situation.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing

Posted by Adam Viener
Unfortunately with Google's fairly vague announcement, the net is abuzz about what unique url means. I have emailed some questions to my Google rep, but until I get specific answers, it looks like we are back to rumor land. Here is what I have heard:
Single URL?
I have heard that Google will actually be looking at the final domain where the customer lands, including all re-directions and frames. They specifically pointed out that framed urls won't work. I have also heard that XXX.domain.com and www.domain.com will be considered the same url.
How Many Ads?
The announcement from Google was vague on if it was going to show 1 ad or the merchant's ad AND an Affiliate ad. I have heard 1 ad, period.
Per Page?
People have asked if this is one unique url per results page or for all results, I hope that it would be per results page, but at this point I don't have any confirmation.
Matching URLs?
A small "by the way" comment in their announcement reads: "Please note that your Display URL must match the URL of your landing page". Some have speculated that this could mean the display url has to match your link url, which would in affect ban search arbitrage all together since affiliates have to link through redirecting urls. I think however, this mealy means the finally destination where the user ends up has to match the display url.
Start Date? Google's announcement didn't commit to an implementation date, saying only sometime in January. Google has told their larger merchants that this will take affect on the January 12th.
Drop the Aff?
Google has also announced with this change that affiliates will no longer need to designate themselves as affiliates in their ads. I am not sure why they would make this move, seem counter productive to the user experience. Perhaps their research showed that nobody knew what aff meant anyway. It could be a sly attempt to get affiliates to modify their ads, thereby costing them their built up CTR rates and advantaging the original owner's sites who don't modify their ads.
Sounds like an opportunity for the super affiliates to re-define themselves. If I am no longer an AFF, what am I? Guess I would rather be a wise-aff than a dumb-aff, only time will tell...
ClizkZ's article on the subject has an interesting quote from Salar Kamanger, director of product management at Google. She says, "The new policy, which will be implemented over the coming weeks, is intended to create a cleaner interface for users, increase the diversity of merchants represented in the links, and reduce duplicate ads, all while recognizing the important benefits affiliate marketers bring to the table"
What are you thoughts? Do you think affiliates feel important to Google? Have you heard anything different?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing

Posted by Adam Viener
Here is the information from Google Adwords:
Google AdWords Announcement:
Affiliate Policy Change
Hello from the Google AdWords Team:
In January 2005, Google will incorporate a new affiliate advertising policy that is designed to provide a better user and advertiser experience.
What is changing:
With this new affiliate policy, we'll only display one ad per search query for affiliates and parent companies sharing the same URL. This way, users will have a more diverse sampling of advertisements to choose from. As always, your ad will be displayed based on its Ad Rank for given searches, which is determined by a combination of your ad's maximum cost-per-click (price) and clickthrough rate (performance).
For instance, if a user searches for books on Google.com or anywhere on the Google search and content networks, Google will take an inventory of ads running for the keyword books. If we find that two or more ads compete under the same URL, we'll display the ad with the highest Ad Rank.
How this will affect you:
If you're an affiliate, this means that you no longer need to identify yourself as an affiliate in your ad text. However, your current ad text will continue to display your affiliate status until you change it.
Affiliates or advertisers using unique URLs in their ads will not be affected by this change. Please note that your Display URL must match the URL of your landing page, and you may not simply frame another site.
What you should do:
We recommend that you continue to monitor your ads' performance and optimize your ads as needed to ensure they're bringing you the best results. Please visit our Optimization Tips page for more information.
By improving our ad relevancy, we believe that users will have a better search experience, which will help you reach more potential clients in the future. We'll continue to make improvements to AdWords over time to further improve the user experience and help increase the performance of your ads.
We look forward to continue providing you with the most effective advertising available.
Sincerely,
The Google AdWords Team
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing
January 06, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
Multiple sources outside of Google have confirmed that the company plans to announce a new policy today that will limit the number of sponsored listings that resolve to the same site per page of search engine results. Google plans to announce their new policy today and it will take effect on January 12th, 2005.
This new policy is an effort by Google to improve the customer experience by displaying more choices to the customer when they conduct any given search.
This new policy should have a large impact on merchant companies who have been relying on a large base of paid search engine marketers to drive traffic to their sites, including sites like eBay, Amazon, Overstock, and BizRate. Also affected are merchant companies that have relied on affiliates to help protect their brand names by having affiliates bid on these terms so that competitors won't be displayed when their brand is searched for on Google.
Of course the paid search affiliate marketer who relies solely on directing traffic directly through affiliate links to their merchant partners will also be greatly affected by this change. All indications are that Google will look at the final destination domain and or IP address to determine duplication of ads, so simple redirects will no longer work. These affiliate marketers will need to build out more individual content sites to survive.
Ironically, this move by Google will force these affiliates, myself included, to take steps that have prevented them from marketing on Overture's service, Google's main competitor.
Google's new policy could deal a major blow to the affiliate marketing community.
Has Google gone back on their policy to do no Evil?
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing
January 01, 2005

Posted by Adam Viener
May your 2005 be happy, safe, and profitable!
Google New Years Logos:





Y2k image lost in the "bug"...
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 29, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
I too received my Google mood radio this Christmas:
I am sure their heart was in the right place, and on first glance it's a really cool gift. Cooler than the USB hard drives they gave out last year, but not quite as useful.
Then I started to think about my current mood regarding Google, and I have to say, my mood isn't so good. Their new predictive CTR policy placed a large percentage of my keyword on hold this holiday season, and based on the speed of the "in trial" words, I am not sure they will all be running by next Christmas. On top of that, I have search terms with 6% - 20% CTRs on the search network being disabled, and am being told that they "must not have performed above .05% on Google.com. They won't provide partner search CTR rates, and I honestly believe that their whole new CTR scheme is broken and they are trying to keep the fact under wraps. I think this is going to greatly affect their revenues for Q4.
Then there is this whole "rumor" about them doing away with search engine arbitrage and forcing advertisers to link to their own urls. One estimate by a former eBay affiliate manager pegs Google's revenues from eBay affiliates at $20 million. That's just one large program, multiply that across all the merchants that affiliates are marketing and it spells a huge revenue drop for Google in Q1 if this is implemented as speculated.
So all in all, I would say my "Google Mood" is fairly bleak. But hey, at least I can look at my new radio when I'm feeling sour.
My New Years resolution is to spend more money with Overture.
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 20, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
As the Holiday shopping season rolls to a close this year, I was surprised and appreciatative of all the companies that sent holiday cards and presents this year.
I was too busy putting up holiday links and trying to work through Google's predictive slowing of the majority of my terms to actually do any business gift shopping this year, so I thought about what I could do as a last minute thank you.
In the spirit of Goyami and the Holiday season, I decided to give out PR5 Goyami links this year to those who sent presents! Because what say's happy holidays more than a boost to your search engine rankings? :-)
Special thanks and Happy Holidays go to:
David Rogers of the New Line Cinema affiliate program and WB affiliate program.
Shawn Collins of AffiliateTip.com and his outsourced affiliate program management consulting services site.
Amy Rodriguez, manager of the Carfax affiliate program. The premeir affiliate program for used vehicle history reports.
Phillip Kidwell and Irene Shih of the eHealthInsurance affiliate program. The #1 health insurance affiliate program.
Nikki Stapp of Internet Marketing Ltd., outsourced affiliate management services.
Peter Greenberg owner of The Morrison House Hotel, the only luxury hotel in Alexandria Virginia.
Everyone on the eBay affiliate team and the eBay affiliate program.
Happy Holidays!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
As the winter holiday begins, we just wanted to wish everyone a happy and save holiday. Thanks for reading Goyami!
Adam & Todd
Here are some holiday logos from Google and Yahoo:







Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 16, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
The Blogvine strikes again. I posted an article a few weeks ago about a post on one of the message boards indicating that someone in the UK had spoken to someone from Google at an event, and that Google was considering banning search arbitrage and forcing advertisers to link to their own website instead of redirecting clickers through the standard affiliate redirect links. I thought I needed to further clarify what I have heard, because some of my merchants have started to contact me about making changes for the impending Google policy change. When I asked where they heard this was a done deal, they pointed me to a blog, that referenced another blogs article, whose article referenced my original article. (The Blogvine
)
I called my Google rep, and she said this was the first she had heard anything like that. She said that if Google would ever make that kind of change they would announce it well in advance to give their advertisers time to adjust.
Here are a few points to consider:
1. Google is making a lot of money from search affiliates. As a public company, Google isnt going to want to do anything that is going to hurt there existing revenue streams. The current policy gives Google a clear competitive advantage over their major rival, Overture.
2. Unlike Overture, who has this policy in place already, Google doesnt allow you to bid for exact position. Googles advertising system will automatically drop off non-performing ads, so the argument that these ads are hurting the search experience is not valid. If customers were not interested in the ads, they would not click, and they would disappear automatically.
3. Making this change would not only hurt affiliates, but would hurt the merchants that the affiliates are advertising. These merchants are often Googles top paying advertisers. If affiliates were forced out, then these merchants would quickly see their competitors taking up the open slots. Google has already stated its policy of not blocking competitors for bidding on trademark terms, this policy has been recently solidified by their victory in their legal case with Geico. (See Geico vs. Google Google Wins!)
So I believe that rumors that this change will happen shortly after the new year, are over exaggerated at this point, and I highly doubt we will see Google making this drastic of a change any time soon.
That being said, it can never hurt to expand your horizons and start building some websites and landing pages for your merchants. Overture has a lot of traffic to offer if you start making these pages now. Dont hesitate to ask your merchants for co-branded or personalized landing pages, many of them would be more than happy to help you out.
Tell me what you think? Do you see this Google policy change happening?
Happy Holidays!
Adam
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics | Affiliate Marketing
December 15, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that search engine giant Google did not violate car insurance vendor Geico's trademarks when it displayed ads for rival insurance providers when users search for "Geico" on Google. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema of the Eastern District of Virginia did not agree with Geico's assertion that the practice diluted its trademarks and caused confusion among consumers.
The judge said that "as a matter of law it is not trademark infringement to use trademarks as keywords to trigger advertising."
"It confirms that our policy complies with the law, particularly the use of trademarks as keywords," said Google general counsel David Drummond. "This is a clear signal to other litigants that our keyword policy is lawful."
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 14, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Just a quick thank you to our Goyami readers / fans. We started Goyami this year, and our readership traffic is on a great trajectory!
Thank you for reading!

Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
Yesterday a federal judge in Alexandria VA heard arguments on the Geico trademark bidding case against Google.
Geico claims that Google's AdWords program, which displays the rival ads under a ''Sponsored Links'' heading next to a user's search results, causes confusion for consumers and illegally exploits Geico's investment of hundreds of millions of dollars in its brand.
Google responded that the ad policy is no different from a supermarket giving out coupons for one product in the checkout line when a customer buys the same product from a different company.
We all await a ruling with baited breath...
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
December 02, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Overture and Geico have agreed to settle the lawsuit brought by Geico, ending part of the trademark dispute battle. Geico had filed suit in May against Overture Services and Google, charging the two commercial search giants with violating its trademarks when selling advertisements linked to its name in search results.
Terms of the settlement have not been disclosed, but a current search for the term Geico on Overture shows lots of competitors. Indicating that Geico may have backed down from their claims.
The case against Google is still on going however, and on Nov 19th, the Judge denied Google's motion for summary judgment, allowing the case to proceed to trial. In late August, the judge did dismiss claims of tortuous interference and statutory business conspiracy charges.
Both Google and Overture continue to argue that the use of trademarks in search related keyword driven ads is fair use.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 19, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Microsoft quietly launched their new search engine at beta.search.msn.com.
There had been some speculation that MSN would roll out their own PPC management utility to go head to head with Google Adwords and Overture when their existing contract with overture expired in June of 2005. However, the companies have announced that they have extended their agreement for another year until June of 2006. I guess Microsoft wants to focus on perfecting their organic search engine and spider technology before building a new platform to own 100% of their PPC traffic.
A quick search on their beta site for web hosting, indicates that Microsoft may be planning a hybrid strategy of hosting their own sponsored ads along side of Overtures. The top two links in the top box and bottom box appear to be run from ads.msn.com while their 3rd link in these boxes and all the ads on the right hand side appear to be driven by overture.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
November 10, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
A friend of mine sent me a link to a posting on Webmaster's world which reads as follows:
---
shaka1978 writes:
"A friend of mine attended a Google University seminar at Earls Court (London, UK) on Thursday last week. Apparently one of the guys from Google said that they were planning to phase out affiliate bidding on AdWords 'very soon'. The reason - showing several ads for the same merchant reflects badly on the user's experience.
I'm a full-time affiliate who primarily uses AdWords to send customers to the exact product page on a merchant's website. If this is true quite frankly I'm in trouble. I called my account rep immediately in horror and he said he'd heard nothing of the sort. I would certainly hope Google would give plenty of warning if they were planning such a huge change.
My concerns were dampened slightly by my colleague informing me that he also said Froogle was going to be 'huge' in the UK this Christmas.
Yeah right! A tall order seeing as Joe Public hasn't a clue it even exists, not to mention it hardly has any merchants onboard etc.
Anyway, I really don't understand what Google's long term plan is. How could they possibly afford to cut off all the revenue from affiliate bids, then kill AdWords completely by giving Froogle a big push (let's face it, why click on AdWords ads when Froogle gives the price). A double whammy, shortly after going PLC with investors to please, I don't think so."
---
This is probably just a nasty rumor, I am checking with my Google reps to make sure.
This would be bad news for super affiliates, bad news for merchants and bad financial news for Google. I was kind of hoping that Overture would take a look at all the revenue that Google is making and change their policy to allow affiliate links.
Has anyone heard anything similar?
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
October 14, 2004

Posted by Todd Tweedy
Liz Gazer is the Affiliate Account Manager for Rugman.com a merchant offering an affiliate program through Commission Junction. We recently exchanged emails concerning the impact search engines are having on merchants and affiliates by removing publisher sites that use datafeeds. Our email exchanges are provided below.
In terms of full disclosure, The Tweedy Group, is an active affiliate in Rugman.com's program, and on a personal note I'm still a bit bummed that the site we created to expand our relationship with Rugman.com -- Oriental Rug Discounts -- is now absent from Google. This is just one of many sites we created in the past few months which seem to have gone missing on major search engines.
Since this is not necessarily a new topic in affiliate arena but rather a situation that can be linked to past industry concerns about affiliate links being removed by search engines I hoping to hear from you so that we can share your insights, experience, and opinions.
Personally Im a bit concern by recent actions CJ has taken to add additional domains for serving and tracking that I believe is an attempt to minimize actions search engines might take against their ad serving even though CJ notes the additions were to allow for future system growth and functionality, Commission Junction is expanding the number of domains we use to serve ads and track clicks.
The question then is do you believe the affiliate datafeed model is dead and there an underlying topic we should be concerned about?
================
Hey Liz,
Thanks for your email, and for following up on our oldie.
Unfortunately, it's more difficult to get a site indexed in the major
search engines when back-end links mirror existing site content of an
advertiser that is running an affiliate program like the site we created for our relationship http://www.oriental-rug-discounts.com. Therefore, I've decided to move away from data feeds.
I'll examine other ways in which we might work together.
Many thanks,
Todd
Hey Todd -
You're very right - unfortunately the big SE's have been giving these
datafeed guys a hard time of recent - chewing them up and spitting them
out so to speak, and I know it.
Still, many of our affiliates simply prefer to use the feeds regardless,
so we are giving them what they have been asking for. Not to mention
that we began building the datafeed system before any of this issue even
came into play.
It will be interesting to see how the affiliate marketing industry
evolves in the next few years with all these SE algorithms changing all
over the place - one minute they index you the next minute they don't.
Keeps us on our toes now doesn't it? :)
Do you have a publisher site at all or are you doing strictly PPC
campaigns? If you've got a publisher site I'd love to be a part of that.
If not, keep me posted on any potential partnerships that may come to
mind. Don't forget about us - we won't forget about you! :)
Cheers,
Liz
Good Wednesday morning Todd,
I've reviewed your rug site and I remember it now. Your people have done a great job on it... what a shame the SE's won't index it the way you'd hoped. At least you know you're not alone.
I'm hearing more and more about this problem in recent weeks... it's
really come at a bad time for us what with the launch of our new
datafeed site and all, but what are curveballs if not to strengthen our
character, right? :)
I'm not sure yet how we're going to handle this issue the SE's have
created for us, but it's evident our serious datafeed affiliates will
have to work on devising new business models soon if they haven't begun
to already - and there are a lot of them out there. Nonetheless, Rugman
plans to support those changes in any way we can.
Re: using my comments in a blog - should I be flattered? (haha) You have
my full permission of course.
All the best,
Liz
Comments (5)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 30, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Media Daily News Reports that a recent study by Clicklab indicates that "fraudulent clicks can account for more than 50 percent of all advertising fees attributable to certain categories". The report categorizes two types of click fraud, competitor clicks and affiliate clicks.
The use of affiliate clicks here is another shot across the bow for the term affiliate in the industry. Soon affiliate will be synonymous with snake oil salesmen, and multi-level marketing. Perhaps this is why we have seen a move in the industry towards the term performance marketing. To be honest I like to think of affiliates as just independent commissioned sales reps. Perhaps Mercenary Marketers would be better...
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 29, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Ok, I have a new pet peeve and would love to hear everyones comments on this. Google has implemented a policy to prevent some trademarks from being used in the Advertising copy. So merchants can request Google to disallow all ads from using the company brand (regardless of the keywords being used).
I am not opposed to this concept in general, but as an affiliate for a company, a internet sales partner who is driving traffic to the company's website, I feel like I should be able to request an exception in Adwords and be granted it rights to use the term as an affiliate without having to have the company fax in a letter of approval.
Here is my thinking. Merchants provide all of their affiliates with banner ads and email text copy that ALWAYS include the company's brand name and product names to promote their services. If the merchant is willing to let me stick an add on my website with their brand, why would they be opposed to letting me stick their name in an ad on someone elses website (in this case Google).
I have actually run into some merchants who are willing to let me test their trademarks and misspellings to make sure their product converts but are unwilling to let me use their product name in my ad copy? So now when I am bidding on General terms for their product, I can't use their product name? Why would I want to promote someone's product without using their name in the ad?
Sure, I could use general keywords, and promote benefits in the Ad copy without using the company's name, but that may or may not be as effective depending on the amount of competition, the quality of the brand, and the quality of the competitive brands in the space.
Finally, the company misses out on all the Brand Awareness they could have gained from the ads, regardless of if they got clicked on or not. See the IAB's Press Release on the Branding Effects of Paid Search
Merchants, let's not tie an affiliate's hands behind their back for doing paid search. If you are willing to let them use your brand on their own Website, don't prevent them from using your brand in their paid advertising that they buy on other sites. It just doesn't make sense.
Comments (10)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 22, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
Oh brother. Recent reports on a new search engine for the gay community using Google's Adsense search capabilities say that Fagoogle is fully in compliance with Google regulations, and as such is neither endorsed, nor shunned by Google.
To be honest, if Google had problems with Booble, I can't imagine them being willing to accept such a blatant rip off of their trademarked logo. This would be a terrible president for them to set. I think it's fine if they want to allow the search, after all that is what the Adsense search is for, targeted and more narrowly defined search. But the logo??? Come on....
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
In Hamburg Germany on Tuesday, a state court dismissed a trademark infringement case brought by Metaspinner Media against Google Deutschland for selling keywords that were triggered of Metaspinner's trademark terms "Preispiraten" or "Price Pirate" software.
Google also faces another lawsuit in the US, recent filed by Rescuecom accusing Google of allowing and advising rival computer service companies to use its trade marked term in their list of sponsored search terms.
Google continues to be the Trademark lawsuit voodoo doll. When will the madness stop?
Suing Google over Trademark infringement appears to be the newest PR stunt. Who ever heard of Rescuecom & Metaspinner anyway? If they start settling, it could be a gold rush! Get a lawyer and get in line!
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
September 03, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
According to CBS Marketwatch. The first batch of employees at Google were able to sell some of their shares yesterday. The stock closed up $1.26.
4.7 Million Shares came due yesterday, another 39 million will be available for sale in November, and another 177 million in February.
If the article is correct in indicating that only 19.6 million shares were offered at the offering, there could be a lot more sellers out there than buyers. It may be an interesting stock slide through February.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

Posted by Adam Viener
CNET reports this morning that "Geico gets green light to sue Google, Overture".
Judge Leone Brinkema of the U.S. District court for the Eastern District of Virginia has denied Google and Overture's motion to dismiss six charges brought by Geico, which alleged that the search companies' use of its name to trigger search-related advertisements was trademark infringement, unfair competition and dilution of its marks under the Lanham Act.
The judge did, however, grant Google & Overture's motions to dismiss claims of tortuous interference and statutory business conspiracy.
This case will be an interesting one to watch. If Geico prevails there will be floodgates of litigation and settlements against PPC Engines, and could hurt the industry as a whole.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
August 31, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
As we launch goyami, we would of course appreciate any help you can give us by linking to our site with standard text links and also by adding a goyami news feed to your site where appropriate. Here are some easy directions for adding a feed to your site.
Visit the following ling, and you can easily modify a few options and grab a quick snippit of javascript code for your site that will add our news feed:
Click here to add goyami to your site
Thanks in advance for your help!
Adam & Todd
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
August 27, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
I came across the GoogleBlog and notcied that they have an updated Google Store. I didn't even realize they had a Google store.
This must have been the first thing they did with their IPO Money. But I have to say, I love the Goo... and its only $14.95.
Be careful about the LavaLamps though, I hear have problems
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
August 25, 2004

Posted by Adam Viener
The debate over using Brand names continues to heat up as a hot topic in the search engine world. On one side you have companies trying to protect their valuable brand assets, and on the other you have affiliates trying to promote the company and competitors pushing their own products.
Should search engines restrict paid (and possibly) organic results when someone types in a brand name on their engines?
What should happen when a company tells their affiliates not to use the brand and then the affiliates start running ads for the companys products through the Amazon's affiliate program or eBay's? Do a search for Oshkosh on Google for an example.
If you take this beyond the search engine world for a second, if I go to BestBuy and ask to see Toshiba Televisions, should the employee be allowed to show me Sharp TVs?
I plan to delve a lot deeper into this topic over the coming weeks and would love to hear your opinions.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics
|
|
include("http://www.corante.com/goyami/rsidebar.php"); ?>
|
|