| Home > Weblog Columns > Goyami | ||||||||||||||
Top affiliates are starting to seriously question the ethics and policies of the major affiliate networks that have long encouraged their employees to participate as affiliates in their merchant’s programs to help them better understand the affiliate marketing industry. This issue was first brought to light by David Lewis on ReveNews. David indicated that three top account managers left CJ last week to avoid enforcement of a new policy that would forbid them being affiliates. It has been very difficult trying to pull together the facts from the rumors on this issue. So far here is what I have heard and believe to be true:
At the industry gatherings, over the past year or so, I have heard growing concerns amongst the top affiliates about what information affiliate network employees may or may not have access to. These concerns and fears have only been heightened by a string of x-affiliate network employees turned super-affiliates overnight. The networks have been very quiet on this issue and are reluctant to make any public comments. This lack of communication is causing an increasing concern of potential wrong doing at the networks. When the networks have to talk to their lawyers before commenting, nobody feels comfortable. I spoke with an x-Linkshare employee who confirmed that when they were with the company being an affiliate was encouraged. I chatted with an existing Linkshare employee who wouldn't provide any information. When pushed to comment, the most I could get out was that they knew if a policy was in place but wouldn't explain if it was a policy forbidding it or encouraging affiliate participation by employees. My contact at Performics indicated that they do have a policy preventing employees from being affiliates. Some in the industry suggest that it's not about having a policy, but more about if the policy has been enforced. In addition to the concern about network employees running their own programs, Top search affiliates are increasingly concerned about the protection of their data and keyword lists as the networks continue to grow their search practices, where they run paid search campaigns for their merchant partners. How does a top search arbitrage affiliate know that they keyword lists aren't being scrapped from the HTTP referrer data that the networks collect? At CJ, I have been informed that this data is protected fairly seriously and that only 2-3 people have access to this data and all calls to that database are tracked. The real problem is the lack of communication, transparency, and full disclosure. Clearly the networks have had issues where employees have had access to private information and strategies of their affiliate partners, clearly many of these employees had and continue to have access to private information and reports on the top affiliate’s business metrics. So spell it out. Send out a communication to your affiliate partners letting them know what your policies are and how their information is going to be protected. Finally, the networks should take a hard look at these x-affiliates and communicate with the top affiliates they had contact with about what programs they are running, what sites they have, and give top affiliates a chance to determine if their business practices have been compromised. The network's are in a precarious position here. Their business model only works because of the trust established with the merchants, and the affiliates. If the networks aren't open, ethical, and forthcoming about these types of issues, then their role in this industry will be diminished. Clearly setting up a new network isn't rocket science. How many new networks started last year alone? In the past affiliates only went where the merchants were, as affiliate business have grown up, I believe that it's the other way around. Merchants will go where the top affiliates are. I hope the networks will respond to these issues and re-establish that trust. Related Articles: Comments (9) + TrackBacks (1) | Category: Affiliate Marketing
TRACKBACKS
POST A COMMENT
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are Affiliate Network Employees Stealing your Business?:
Double-Dipping the Affiliate Chip from Affiliate Program Tip Blog
The issue of affiliate network employees acting as affiliates in their own time is not going away. I keep hearing from affiliates who are mad as hell about the whole situation. If you are not familiar with this situation, where some former CJ employees... [Read More]
Tracked on April 11, 2006 5:19 PM
|
|
| ||||||||||||
1. G on February 2, 2006 1:47 PM writes...
This is not something new...This happened to me 3 years ago. A then CJ employee stole the idea/techniques for a very profitable niche i was working in (the monetery damage would be at least $300k-$400k), he even stole the site design, optimization techniques etc...
The things i learned, never ever list your revenue sites in aff networks, redirect to merchants thro intermediary domain(s), never use keywords directly in subids to track keyword level performance instead use codes.
Permalink to Comment2. Adam Viener on February 2, 2006 1:58 PM writes...
G,
That's a pretty serious and specific acquisation. Do you want to give us more information? Who was the employee? Did CJ know about it? Did you approach CJ at all with this issue, and if so what whas their response?
Adam
Permalink to Comment3. G on February 2, 2006 2:26 PM writes...
No Adam, i didnt complained to CJ because shortly the merchant left CJ and started their own inhouse aff software. So i talked with the merchant. But at that time that guy also ranked pretty good in SE's so the merchant was unwilling to boot him.
I think he resigned soon after from CJ. Even now every time i saw him post on webmasterworld my blood boils :) , anyway you live and learn!
Permalink to Comment4. Adam Viener on February 2, 2006 3:09 PM writes...
G,
I can imagine how you feel. Why don't you share his name so we all know who to watch out for?
Adam
Permalink to Comment5. G on February 2, 2006 4:02 PM writes...
Sorry Adam, i dont want to expose his name ,as i said he got out of CJ long time ago, so outing his name will not help existing affiliates!.
BTB I think he worked in data mining at CJ, so he was in a pretty good postion to find out what works and what not...You know funny thing is he even got some links to his first site from cj.com (in a section called new site of the month or something)
Permalink to Comment6. Adam Viener on February 3, 2006 6:43 AM writes...
G,
No offense, but too much on this topic has been and continues to be "off the record" or hidden. It makes it really hard to fully understand what has or has not been done, and what is reality verses paranoia.
Adam
Permalink to Comment7. G on February 3, 2006 12:23 PM writes...
As you know ours is a industry with a low barrier to entry and do you think a aff network employee with all the key data is just going to sit back and see others making hundreds of thousands?.
The only reason i posted my bad expirence is i wanted all affiliates to be paranaoid in their relationship with the networks/merchants and if using PPC the SE reps!.
Permalink to Comment8. James Omdahl on February 22, 2006 1:20 PM writes...
Wow! I know I am coming in a little late on post, but I just found it.
I am shocked to hear that CJ would allow its employees to be affiliates. Not only because they can take advantage of advertisers and merchants, but because it seems to be a pretty poor way to retain talented employees.
I am happy to hear that they have changed the policy, but the fact that this type of thing was going on in the first place is disappointing.
Permalink to Comment9. Affiliate on February 27, 2006 2:31 PM writes...
That's old news, though it's great to see you stir this burning issue. The solution is rather straightforward...just use landing pages that don't pass referrer information.
Permalink to Comment