Corante

About This Blog
Goyami - Named after Gooogle, Yahoo, and Microsoft, Goyami is a Paid & Natural Search Engine Marketing Blog! Covering Search Engine Marketing and Affiliate Marketing Industry News.
GOYAMI's
AFFILIATE & SEARCH
MARKETING GURU
Adam Viener Adam Viener
adam@goyami.com
( Profile | Biz | Archive )

Goyami

Monthly Archives

February 28, 2005

Overture Improves Speed of Listings

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

In a world of instant gratification, Overture has announced that 80% of new paid ad listings should be online within an hour, while the remaining 20% shouldn't take longer than 2 days.

"We previously promised a three-to-five-day turnaround on new listing submissions, and we recognized that that was unacceptable," says Lisa Morita.

Wow, amazing...

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Pay Per Click Management Tools

How People Search – (Search Engine Strategies, New York)

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

I attended a session today about Search Behavior where Inquiro, and Peformics presented their latest studies on how people are using the search engines and their affect on site traffic and customer buying behavior. (Keynote also presented a study, but I found very little of it to be relevant). Here are some of the very interesting takeaways:

Inquiro’s Study


  • Contrary to their prior beliefs about the importance of titles and descriptions, Inqurio’s study found that the only statistical relevant predictor of driving traffic volume from Google searches is your rank and page position.
  • Inquiro’s study employed some very interesting eye tracking technology from eyetools which let them see exactly where people were looking on the page, for how long, and where there eyes went next. From this they have defined what they call “Searches Golden Triangle”. This is the top left portion of the screen where customers quickly scan from the top down for relevant information, if their eye catches something relevant they will quickly scan to the right to verify. From a paid search perspective on Google, it highlights that the most important spots would be Google’s two top sponsored link’s that appear above the searches as opposed to the ones that show up on the right hand side. I will try and get a copy of their slide that shows this but in ascii characters it would like something like this:

    XXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXX
    XXXX
    XX
    X

  • Inquiro’s study further showed that if searches didn’t find what they wanted in their first “F Scan” at the top of the page, 60% would scroll down and repeat in the organic searches, while 40% would start a vertical scan from the top of the sponsored links on the right hand side. Eye tracking tools showed that only the top 1-3 ads were relevant, with 50% going to the top, 30% to number two, and then quickly dropping down to less than 10% seeing the bottom 3 ads on a page.

Performics’ Study


  • Performics’ study took a look at 30 e-commerce sites and then looked at cScoreData for people who purchased from those sites and relevant keyword searches they had done leading up to the initial purchase. They found that 50% of all buyers made a relevant search before their online purchase.
  • There was an average of 4-5 searches prior to purchases.
  • Their research showed that most searches started off as searches on generic terms, and most buyers never searched on a brand term.
  • When buyers who searched on branded terms tended to search on these terms later in the purchase cycle, just prior to making an online purchase, which may be why some ROI tools show branded terms converting at higher rates than generic terms. A special note, that many of these buyers were introduced and “pre-sold” on a specific brand from the prior generic searches they had performed.
  • 55% of buyers did their last relevant search more than 2 weeks before the purchase.

This was a very interesting session, and I had a few takeaways from this that I think are extremely relevant to companies doing paid search and search engine affiliate marketers:


  1. For companies paying for their own search campaigns, it is important to take a full view of your ROI. If you are only looking at short term click conversions that you may be quickly out spent by competitors who are able to see long term click trends and conversions and offline buying behavior driven from search.
  2. Affiliate marketers should review the cookie periods that their merchants are providing. Anything less than 30 days means that you are probably directly driving sales that you should be getting credit for.
  3. Affiliate marketers may also want to stay away from companies that are only willing to let you bid on generic terms, because these generic terms may be driving a significant number of “pre-sales” behavior that is then turning into branded searches just prior to the customer making the online purchase. If the merchant is reserving these high conversion ads only for themselves, and overwriting affiliate cookies when customers click on their own paid search terms, then they may be taking credit for the sales you are playing a large role in generating for them.
  4. Finally, with the relationship between generic searches early and branded searches later in the process, are your ROI tracking tools only looking at the last click, or can they show the full cycle of clicks?

    It’s all rather thought provoking and is worth thinking about and spurring further discussions.

    Adam

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News

Search Engine Strategies (SES) New York

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

Today marks the kick off of Jupiter’s Search Engine Strategies Convention in New York City. I will be on site and hope to post updates and interesting information that I take away from the sessions and events that I attend.

This morning I attended a session on the search engine landscape with presentations from comScore, Hitwise, and Neilson NetRatings. All presenters spoke quickly about their user tracking methodologies and then went into current findings. Here are some quick takeaways:

  • Google still leads with approx 50% market share
  • MSN is gaining on Yahoo for the second place spot and the industry is watching closely to see what Microsoft will do with their desktop position and large marketing muscle.
  • Google is very dominant in European markets.
  • Companies need to take a broad ROI prospective to measure the true value of their search engine marketing efforts. These tracking companies are showing that conversions can take place 30-90 days out and even longer. Additionally, companies must find ways to measure how search effects offline transactions to gain a full picture. ComScore noticed that in the electronics space, as much as 90% of conversions actually occur offline.

The next few days should be interesting with all the sessions and impending snow storm in New York.

Adam

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News

February 25, 2005

Morphing into a Blacklist for CJ Links?

Email This Entry

Posted by Todd Tweedy

The launch of AOL's new local search tool -- http://search.aol.com -- this week isn't necessarily that interesting. In fact, GoYaMi is pleased they could join the party.

What could be interesting is how AOL might use it's email block/blacklist of naughty email spammer URLs to keep their search index clean of URL's that have sent unsolicited communications to the ISP's members. The AOL block list also contains URL’s that the ISP views as deceptive, including URLs from CJ that “morph” or redirect visitors to different destinations.

Check this out. If you send an email to an AOL account and in the message you include one of CJ's domains -- like http://www.dpbolvw.net -- your email will bounce.

This happened to me the other day as I was working with my developer. When my email bounced, I contacted AOL. After doing a mail test or two, the AOL representative said the URL in my email was being blocked "because we believe it to be a morpher."

A morpher you say?? Indeed. Turns out AOL is blocking certain CJ URLs in emails to AOL members due to the fact that the destination URL constantly changes. Commission Junction has approximately 1,500 merchants so it’s pool of 5 URL must be changing a bunch with publisher ID's redirecting visitors to hundreds of product and service offerings.

Could this impact indexing of URL's in search result pages for affiliates using CJ links? What should you do? Nothing for now. AOL hasn't made any formal announcements nor have websites we monitor been impacted:

http://www.for-sale-now.com
http://www.web-hosting-for-websites.com
http://www.rootdomaincheck.com
http://www.askthejewelryguy.com

GoYaMi will keep monitoring this issue for you, and if any new information breaks we'll keep you updated.

Todd

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

Search Stocks Drop --Findwhat trying to find bottom

Email This Entry

Posted by Todd Tweedy

Huge bummer if you were holding FWHT yesterday as the stock tanked on flat earning. Nice overview piece by Reuters is provided below.

Have a great weekend

Todd

UPDATE 2-Growth, pricing fears roil Web search stocks
Thu Feb 24, 2005 06:00 PM ET
(Adds quote on IAB report, closing share prices)
By Michele Gershberg

NEW YORK, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Shares in Internet advertising companies and search engines dropped sharply on Thursday, as investors worried about growth and weaker Web search pricing.

Online ad leaders Google Inc. (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research) and Yahoo Inc. (YHOO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) saw their shares fall more than 4 percent on the Nasdaq after one investment bank downgraded ratings for both companies on Thursday. FindWhat.com (FWHT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) slipped more than 21 percent after reporting flat earnings on Wednesday and search engine Ask Jeeves Inc. (ASKJ.O: Quote, Profile, Research) dropped more than 8 percent.

U.S. Internet ad spending is expected to rise up to 25 percent this year as marketers move more budgets online. But some investors are concerned the breakneck expansion of online advertising over the last two years will slow in 2005, affecting growth at Google, Yahoo and their smaller rivals.

RBC Capital Markets on Thursday cut Yahoo's investment rating to "sector perform" from "outperform" and trimmed its price target to $34 from $43. Google's rating was reduced to "sector perform" from "top pick" and its price target dropped to $200 from $250.

RBC analyst Jordan Rohan said both companies were seeing keyword prices drop in the double digits on a quarterly basis as advertisers strike harder bargains. He also noted high market valuations for both companies, with Google trading at more than 49 times projected 2005 earnings and Yahoo at nearly 66 times earnings this year.

Increased anxiety over the downgrades spilled over into the options market, where volumes were heavier than usual for both Google and Yahoo.

"The downgrade in Google brought down the prospect of future growth rates for the company," said Tim Biggam, chief options strategist at Man Financial. "Although Yahoo is down, options players are expressing more concern and are willing to pay more for puts and calls, pushing up volatility.

ONLINE AD SPENDING SEEN STRONG

The downgrade also followed a joint report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers that lowered their estimate for third-quarter Internet ad spending to $2.3 billion from a previous estimate of $2.4 billion as more accurate spending data became available.

Peter Petrusky, director of advisory services at PricewaterhouseCoopers, noted that online ad spending has been growing steadily to about $9.6 billion last year. Though the rate of increase would be expected to diminish as the base of comparison grows larger, that shouldn't spark fears over individual companies, he said.

Other analysts also view the share declines as temporary. Online ad spending will remain strong in the United States and has room to grow dramatically overseas, said David Garrity of Caris & Company.

"Corporate advertisers are having trouble staying in touch with their mass markets these days," Garrity said. "There are very few alternatives and the best one you and I can probably think of is paid online search."

Garrity expected any weakness in paid search listing prices to be temporary and said FindWhat.com and Ask Jeeves may have been more aggressive on pricing as they fought for market share. He reiterated a "buy" rating on Yahoo and an "above average" rating on Google.

Google closed $5.06 lower at $188.89. Yahoo fell 64 cents to $31.48, FindWhat dropped $2.50 to $10.95, while Ask Jeeves lost $1.48 to $21.77. (Additional reporting by Doris Frankel in Chicago)


© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

February 24, 2005

The Top 10 Ways to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

I recently prepared a presentation for EcomXpo, and thought that Goyami readers might be interested in reading the script. The goal of the presentation was to give a PPC Super Affiliate perspective on what affiliate managers can do to drive us away from their program.

If you would like to see the slides you may Download the Presentation.

The Top 10 Ways to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program

Introduction:
Welcome to “The Top 10 Ways to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program”, my name is Adam Viener and I am the president of imwave and an editor of Goyami. My company, imwave, is focused on using search engine marketing to drive sales and leads to our partner’s websites, we do this for our partners and clients on both a pay-for-performance and consulting basis. Goyami is a search and affiliate marketing blog that I founded and is part of the target="_blank">Corante technology and business intelligence news network.

Super affiliates come in many flavors, so before we get into the Top 10 ways to repel super affiliates, I want to define the specific type of super affiliate I am talking about. More and more of company’s top affiliates are those that successfully leverage pay-per-click advertising to drive traffic to your company’s programs. These pay-per-click search affiliates, also known as search arbitragers, risk their own money every day to buy pay-per-click advertising betting that the companies they have partnered with can convert that traffic into commissionable events on their site which will earn them more than the cost of their ads. These super affiliates spend a lot of time building keyword lists and often send traffic from their search engine ads directly to the merchant’s site without ever landing on a site of their own. Some of these affiliates do this on a part-time basis and continue to keep their “day jobs”, and they often test a lot of company’s programs across many industries to see which ones will convert the best.

As I prepare this presentation, Google has just recently announced their new affiliate policy of only allowing one ad per url in their searches. Undoubtedly, these super affiliates, like myself, are working hard to adjust their efforts to work within these new rules. So without further a-doo, let’s get into the top 10 ways to repel these super affiliates from your program.


Number 10: Poor or Missed Communications

I hear affiliate managers struggling with this question all the time, how should the communicate with their top affiliates? Should they call their top affiliates on the phone or wait for them to call? Well, some affiliates have full-time jobs, and may not be able to talk on the phone. Before I started focusing on this full-time, I sat in a cube-farm with my boss in the next cube. Talking on the phone wasn’t an easy option for me during the day. What about email?

Since affiliates may join hundreds of programs, they get a lot of newsletters. I had to setup a separate email box just for the newsletters which I hardly ever read. Right now, I have over 2 thousand un-read messages in that mailbox for only 3 months worth of messages. I have filters setup to highlight messages that come into that box that I might not want to miss. The partners that I communicate with via email have learned that adam@imwave.com is my 2-way communication email box, and partners@imwave.com (the one I have registered with) is not. For me, AOL instant messenger is my preferred form of communications, it let’s me contact partners when I need them, and allows partners to contact me when they need me.

Finally, I get very few postal mail communications from merchants. This is probably the best way to reach potential affiliates who are either not in your program or who have joined and are not active yet. A quick welcome to the program postcard might go a long way. Ebay sent out a flyer about how one of their affiliates earned over 1 million in one month, and that sparked my interest in their program, now I am one of their top affiliates. Sad to say, I have not yet earned a million in 1 month. The bottom line here, is that there is no 1 best way to communicate with your top partners, you need to learn what their favored form of communication is and adapt.


Number 9: Dropping inactive affiliates

How often do you non-active affiliates from your list? Some affiliates will sign up for all the programs in a specific network so that when they are ready to run a test they will already be a member. Does purging affiliates really save that much time in reporting and communicating? An affiliate who took the time to sign-up for your program could have great potential, affiliates belong to far more programs than they market today, please don’t purge us. If you must purge your list, be sure not to do it before your busy season, I had one costume site purge me right before Halloween.


Number 8: Providing Lots of Coupon Codes

How often do you send out coupon codes to your affiliates? Are these codes ones that customers must enter during the checkout process? If a search arbitrager is linking to your site directly from a Google ad, there is very little chance the affiliate has room to communicate the code, and even less chance that if they did the customer would remember to type it in. Coupons may be a great way to drive sales on your site though, so how can they work for arbitragers?

A better option would be to provide a landing page that sells the customer and promotes the coupon code, the best option would be to embed the code in the link, so that the customer’s don’t have to do anything but click on the ad and the offer detailed on the landing page, and is automatically included when they check out. It is important to mention the offer on the landing page, Google requires that any offer referenced in the ad must be available within 1 click on the landing page, otherwise the ads will be disabled.


Number 7: Asking Affiliates to Change Links or Ad Copy

How often do affiliates have to change their Ads for your program? If you make a change that breaks old links, typical website affiliates might just have a broken link on their site, but pay-per-click affiliates may be paying to drive traffic to error pages which will cost them money with each click to an error page.

Google determines the ranking of an ad based on the amount the affiliate is willing to pay per click as well as the click through rate of the ad for that specific keyword term. As ads are run over time, they build up position for important keywords, and if the ads are modified in any way, Google considers these ads new, and affiliates may have to pay more to maintain their ranking or risk driving less traffic and generating less sales. Always do what you can to make asking affiliates to change their ads, the last resort.


Number 6: Not Understanding the Metrics

Understanding your affiliates financial model is critical to the success of any program. How do you determine how much you are going to pay affiliates? You need to know their metrics before you should answer this question.

Pay-Per-Click Search affiliate pay for every click and often lose money. That is important, so let me repeat it. THEY OFTEN LOSE MONEY. These affiliates will often test a lot of programs to see which ones will have the best return per click. There are typically 3 possible outcomes of a test:


  1. The ads lose money, and the test and relationship is over (note, they don’t usually tell you it’s over, they just pause their ads and move on to the next test)

  2. The ads generate a small return per click. These may remain as ongoing tests until they start losing money.

  3. The ads generate a good return per click, these are the companies that the affiliates fully engage and do additional keyword research, build out sites, or otherwise grow their revenue stream.


There are really 3 key variables that determine the revenue per click, two of which are more controlled by the merchant and one in direct control of the affiliate. The merchant controls the amount of commission they are willing to pay and what the customer’s experience when they reach the merchant’s site, which results in a conversion rate of the traffic that the affiliate sends. Affiliates control how much they are willing to pay per click. The amount that the affiliate makes per click is equal to the commission rate times the conversion rate percentage, less the cost per click. Let’s look at an example

Let’s assume the merchant pays a hefty 25% of sales (I have seen this rate marketed in Revenue Magazine by companies looking for new affiliates). Also let’s say the merchant’s average order size is $100. This means that if the customer buys they affiliate can expect to make roughly $25 per transaction.

The merchant’s site isn’t great, and they are only converting about 1% of visitors to sales, but the category is fairly popular and the affiliate feels they need to bid 35 cents per click to generate traffic on their keywords. When you multiply the $25 by the 1% conversion rate, you can see that the affiliate is making only 25 cents per click, so they can expect to lose 10 cents on every click. Nice rate, but bad return.

This merchant either needs to drastically improve their conversion rates or pay a lot more in commissions to make the relationship work. Merchants must do the math, and understand these metrics to make sure affiliates have room to bid and be profitable.


Number 5: Running Pop-up Ads

Pop-up ads can be an effective way for merchants to drive more sales and promote new features to their customers, but can have a drastic affect on your pay-per-click search affiliates. If the landing pages you allow your affiliates to link to have pop-ups your affiliates paid ads are going to get disabled.

Pop-ups include any additional browser window that opens when the customer enters or exits the landing page. Pop-ups are often implemented to promote customer surveys and seasonal promotions. If you feel must use a pop-up to promote your business please consider landing pages without pop-ups for search affiliates. Make sure these are clearly labeled and that you communicate well that they are available, because a search affiliate might just check the first ad to see if there is a pop-up, and if there is they might move on and never return.

Consider providing a parameter that affiliates can pass in the affiliate link to your site that disables the pop-up ad. Finally, you might be able to accomplish the same result using DHTML overlays on your site instead of pop-ups, this would allow messages to appear on top of your page without triggering pop-up blockers or getting your affiliates ads disabled.


Number 4: Difficult Display url Policy

Some merchants allow affiliates to link directly to their site via affiliate links, but have a policy of not allowing affiliates to use their domain name in the display url of their ads. This can confuse customers because they see one URL in the ad, but end up somewhere else. This policy often is a pre-courser for not allowing affiliates to link directly to the merchant’s site and forcing them to build their own site to market the company or abandon the company’s program all together. Finally, Google has a policy that display urls must match the landing page url, so this policy often forces pay-per-click search affiliates to market for your competition.


Number 3: Trademark Bidding Policy

Some merchants do not allow affiliates to bid on the companies name. I have found that bidding on a companies name and variations of their name often provide me a good indication of how well the site can convert traffic. If the site can’t sell people who are typing their name into a search engine, than they won’t convert any of the other more generic keyword traffic I could send them.

As you saw in the metrics, promoting a site with a poor conversion rate can cost an affiliate a lot of money. Additionally, many merchants have used affiliates bidding on their trademarks as a way to block competitors ads on those marks from appearing on the first screen.

With the Geico decision and Google’s new single ad per url policy in place, it will be harder and harder for companies to keep competitors from bidding on their names. Working with top affiliates creatively here could be very important.

Finally, if you must have a no trademark bidding policy, be specific and give affiliates a specific list of terms that they are not allowed to bid on. Also, when you make this list be smart and don’t include generic terms, even if they are part of your name, because you can bet your competitor’s and their affiliates will be bidding on those generic terms.


Number 2: Indirect Trademark Bidding Policy

Some merchants have adopted a policy of not only preventing affiliates from bidding on their trademarks directly, but preventing them from accidentally showing up under these terms indirectly. An example of this would be if you were one of the top flower companies on the Internet, and your affiliates might not be able to bid on the term flowers because the search engines might match the term flowers with keyword searches for your brand name, pro flowers, 1-800-flowers, or flowers direct.

The only way an affiliate could bid on these terms would be to implement a specific list of negative terms that their ads are not allowed to show for. If you adopt this type of policy, and your competitors don’t, their affiliate’s ads will show up on your terms even though they are not bidding on them directly.

And the Number 1 Way to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program?

Number 1: Not Understanding the Technology

Remember your policies have to work with the current technology, and some policies can have un-foreseen consequences. For example:

I have recently seen more and more default trademark policy language on Commission Junction’s merchants preventing direct and indirect bidding on companies marks and misspelled variations. The technological consequence of this is that pay-per-click affiliates who decide to participate in the program can not bid on any term using broad or phrased match, because it is impossible for them to ad negative terms for every misspelled possibility, especially when Overture only allows 15 negative terms.

The technical result of not allowing affiliates to use the company domain in their display url is disabled ads or poor user experience.

The technical result of putting pop-up ads on your site, is disabling existing pay-per-click affiliates ads and new affiliates never running tests to see if they want to market your program.

The technical result of asking affiliates to change their ads is affiliates losing rankings in their ads, higher costs for your affiliates and reduced results in your program.

Finally, the result of not understanding the technology, is more affiliates marketing for your competition who do understand the technology.


Conclusion:
Thank you for listening to, I mean reading, my presentation. At the end of the day, affiliates and merchants are both looking for the same thing, to create win-win relationships where both the merchant and the affiliate can make money and enjoy working with each other. That’s the only way this works.

Please feel free to IM (AdamViener) me or email me if you have any questions, I look forward to hearing from you.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

February 23, 2005

Name Development Limited sold for 164.2 Million - Misspelled Domains are Hot

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

Misspelled and Expired Domain names that get a lot of traffic are becoming hot commodities. As evidenced by two recent transactions.

First, Marchex has agreed to pay 164.2 Million for Name Development Ltd., which displays keyword advertising across a portfolio of more than 100,000 domains. With domains like careerinfo.com, debts.com, and hardware-update.com.

Name Development Ltd business model has been to buy expiring domains with existing traffic and point them to a parked page provider, like Domainhop and TrafficZ, who are willing to setup a site and pay them on a per-click basis. Companies like Name Development Ltd, use tools such as Popusearch and Mozzle to identify which of the expiring domains have a lot in sites linking to them.

Second, the misspelled domain voyuer.com was auctioned off for $112,100 at Snapnames during it's expiration period. The prior owner of Voyuer.com failed to renew the domain name from Network Solutions for $35, and Network Solutions sent the domain into the snapnames auction service to auction it off during the "grace period", the short amount of time after the customer's expiration date but before it was officially dropped by the Registry. In this process, SnapNames, Network Solutions, and the prior owner of the domain, share in the sales proceeds, with 15-20% of Network Solutions' unspecified portion of the sale going to the original registrant. So assuming that Snapnames shares 50%, the original registrant's percentage could be as high as 10% of the overall transaction, or $11,210 for the domain they didn't think was worth the $35 renewal fee. Not bad, but it might hurt a little knowing they could have sold it for the full $112,100. Of course, Network Solutions prominently spells this all out in schedule A section 14 service agreement that is subject to constant change and takes affect 30 days after posting the change to their site.

As more and more companies find ways to monetize "surfing traffic", expired domain names could be worth more and more. Additionally, creative affiliates should continue to explore possible domains with traffic that might drive sales to your merchant partners.

You can bid up a keyword term all day long, and Google makes more and more money, but a domain name that you purchase can be a long term asset for your company.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

February 16, 2005

eComXpo - Online Tradeshow for Affiliate Marketing

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

eComXpo is set to kick off tomorrow, and I had a chance to take a sneak preview today. This online tradeshow promises to be a lively event full of tradeshow booths, presentations, prize giveaways, and virtual networking chat rooms. This is the first year that this has been tried, and it looks like it will be a huge success.

With hundreds of merchants and thousands of affiliates participating, it's bound to be interesting.

Here is a quick screen shot of the main tradeshow exhibit hall:

ecomexpo.jpg

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Affiliate Marketing

February 14, 2005

Happy Valentines Day

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

The Goyami staff would like to wish everyone a very Happy Valentines Day!

In Goyami tradition, we have dug up some of the past Google Valentines day logos:

valentine05.gif

valentine04.gif

valentine2.gif

valentine01spez.gif

valentine01.gif

valentine.gif

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

February 12, 2005

Wisconsin Quarter Misprint Errors

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

Tracking keyword trends with tools such as Wordtracker can be interesting. Yesterday I noticed that the top word being searched for was Wisconsin Quarter. A quick search on Google showed that an NPR article indicated that there was a misprint on some Wisconsin Quarters making an undetermined number of them worth up to $500. That's a great return on investment for a quarter.

This should turn into a hot news topic as well as a hot auction item, perfect for online auctions.

Comments (9) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

February 11, 2005

Affilaites and Merchants Reacting to new Google Policy

Email This Entry

Posted by Adam Viener

It has been almost a month since Google new affiliate marketing policy went into place, and I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how some of the merchants have been reacting.

I have seen affiliate managers taking some proactive steps to help their programs continue to thrive. Here are some examples of what I am seeing out there:

Merchant Provided Landing Pages
Many programs are starting to build landing pages for their top affiliate managers, so that their affiliates can host co-branded or private label pages that promote their company's products. Here are some examples of Landing Pages I have seen:

  • LendingTree (landing page)
  • eHealthInsurance (co-branded landing page)
  • LowerMyBills (available in CJ interface)
  • X10 Security Cameras (private label)
  • Monster Web Templates (private label with their own site builder tool)
  • HomeGain Local Real Estate Agent Finder (private label)
  • Proflowers (available in befree interface)

    Affiliate Created Landing Pages
    Affiliates have also been proactive in creating landing pages that market multiple companies. Here are some examples of some of the pages I have done, as well as others I have seen:

  • For-Sale-Now.com - Dynamic Comparison Shopping Site
  • WineByPost.co.uk - UK Wine Delivery Site
  • Carfax.Car-History-Reports.com - Carfax History Reports landing page
  • Loan-Center.us - Top 10 Internet Loan Sites for online Lending and Mortgages
  • CallAlertReviews.com - Call Alert Reviews and Comparisons
  • Go-Anywhere-PC-Access.com - GotoMyPC Promotion
  • Play-Real-Music-Online.com - Real Rhapsody promotion site
  • Great-ISP-Deals.com - Discount ISP deals and comparison site
  • AskTheTireGuy.com - TireRack Discount Tires promotion site
  • Oriental-Rug-Discounts - Rugman Oriental Rug Promotions.
  • HR Block Taxes landing page.
  • DealForTravel.com Travel Promotion Site.

    Time Sensitive Sites
    I have also seen affiliates creating specific sites to market specific holidays or time of year promotions:

  • Flowers-For-Valentines-Day.com Valentines Day promotions and deals.
  • Save-on-Christmas-Gifts.com - Christmas Gifts Site
  • Xmas-Deals.com - Christmas Deals and Promotions
  • Hallowen-Costume-Sale.com - Halloween Costume Site
  • HR Block Taxes landing page.

    It is great to see affiliates and merchants working together to overcome the current Google policy change.

    I am sure I have missed a lot of good examples, please feel free to add a comment to this post and tell us about the other sites you have seen or have created.

  • Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

    February 8, 2005

    Louis Vuitton vs Google

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Adam Viener

    The Parisian District Court has ruled against Google, saying that Google's allowing competitors to run ads triggered by Louis Vuitton's trademark terms was counterfeiting, unfair competition and misleading advertising. The court has ordered Google to pay Louis Vuitton $250,000 and stop displaying ads for Vuitton's competitors whenever users type in the company's name into the search engine.

    Google said it was still considering whether or not to appeal the ruling. "We're studying the ruling," said Google spokesperson Myriam Boublil. "No decision's been taken yet on an appeal." Only a month ago, Google lost a similar case with Le Meridian Hotels, in which the search engine firm was fined $2,550 and ordered to pay costs.

    Managing different trademark policies in different countries could prove difficult for Google, and we may see this trigger harder positions on trademark bidding in the US in the near future.

    Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

    Keyword Stock Index?

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Adam Viener

    Paul Kedrosky hypothesizes that there could be a financial model built around the trend in category keyword prices and the stock market segment.

    Interestingly enough, I have had several calls from investment firms and hedge funds over the past few weeks trying to understand the changing policies of Google and how they might affect companies future revenues and thus stock prices.

    I agree with Paul, that watching the trends in keyword prices could be a valuable predictor of future stock prices, I would also suggest that as an affiliate marketer that markets across multiple categories, that we may be in a position to understand customer buying behavior and sales conversion trends better than most.

    For example, British Airways has had a run up on their stock of 15% since December, but this month their conversion rates tanked on the traffic I had been sending them and I lost quite a bit of money. Could that be a predictor that British Airways is going to have a stock slide?

    Prices in keywords could be a good predictor, but tracking the trends in site conversion rates could be even better.

    Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News

    February 7, 2005

    Welcome to the Search Wars

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Adam Viener

    Microsoft has recently launched their new search engine and already pundits are questioning the amount of advertising for each search.

    The bulk of the latest release revolves around Microsoft using it's own spider to identify relevant organic search results, brining MSN Search one step closer to owning 100% of their product.

    On the paid search side, they are still running the bulk of their pay-per-click ads through Overture. Recently they extended their deal with overture until June of 2006.

    Besides using Overture's paid search, MSN also offers up to 3 available spots on any search for featured sites willing to pay a minimum of $75,000 per year.

    When you look at these moves and Microsoft's recent aggressive use of head hunters to build up their own internal search department, it clearly spells that Microsoft is targeting their full force behind search.

    I think we will quickly see search being an embedded feature of the next operating system and quickly Microsoft will replay the browser wars on the search space.

    Authoritative rumors have it that Google turned down a Microsoft buy-out proposal prior to the Google IPO. It will be interesting to watch how the search war plays out and if Google can do better than Netscape did in the Browser war.

    Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News

    February 3, 2005

    Google Adwords Keyword Hijacking

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Adam Viener

    Recent reports indicate that unscrupulous folks in Cyberspace may be using the Google AdWords "feature" of disabling keywords that don't get clicked to their own advantage. By running programs that do a lot of searches on a specific term, they can get their competitor's ads disabled, and allow them to gain top ad positions and lower rates.

    This will be an interesting development to watch.


    Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics

    February 2, 2005

    Google on the Move

    Email This Entry

    Posted by Adam Viener

    Google has been on the move recently, a 7 Fold rise in net profit surprised Wall Street sending the stock up 14 points today.

    A little more quietly, Google has become an ICANN registered registrar which will allow them to start selling domain names. There is a lot of speculation about what they will do with this status. The most obvious fit would be to offer cheap domain names as an up sell to their blogger and gmail services. Some have speculated that this could be a move towards the hosting market.

    Finally, Google has announced a new beta API interface to their Adwords product that will enable creative programmers to provide add on services and let savvy marketers gain better control over their Adwords advertising. It will be fun to watch as new 3rd party services hit the market.

    Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News