| Home > Weblog Columns > Goyami | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In a world of instant gratification, Overture has announced that 80% of new paid ad listings should be online within an hour, while the remaining 20% shouldn't take longer than 2 days. "We previously promised a three-to-five-day turnaround on new listing submissions, and we recognized that that was unacceptable," says Lisa Morita. Wow, amazing... Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Pay Per Click Management Tools How People Search (Search Engine Strategies, New York)
I attended a session today about Search Behavior where Inquiro, and Peformics presented their latest studies on how people are using the search engines and their affect on site traffic and customer buying behavior. (Keynote also presented a study, but I found very little of it to be relevant). Here are some of the very interesting takeaways: Inquiros Study
Performics Study
This was a very interesting session, and I had a few takeaways from this that I think are extremely relevant to companies doing paid search and search engine affiliate marketers:
Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News Search Engine Strategies (SES) New York
Today marks the kick off of Jupiters Search Engine Strategies Convention in New York City. I will be on site and hope to post updates and interesting information that I take away from the sessions and events that I attend. This morning I attended a session on the search engine landscape with presentations from comScore, Hitwise, and Neilson NetRatings. All presenters spoke quickly about their user tracking methodologies and then went into current findings. Here are some quick takeaways:
The next few days should be interesting with all the sessions and impending snow storm in New York. Adam Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News February 25, 2005Morphing into a Blacklist for CJ Links?
The launch of AOL's new local search tool -- http://search.aol.com -- this week isn't necessarily that interesting. In fact, GoYaMi is pleased they could join the party. What could be interesting is how AOL might use it's email block/blacklist of naughty email spammer URLs to keep their search index clean of URL's that have sent unsolicited communications to the ISP's members. The AOL block list also contains URLs that the ISP views as deceptive, including URLs from CJ that morph or redirect visitors to different destinations. Check this out. If you send an email to an AOL account and in the message you include one of CJ's domains -- like http://www.dpbolvw.net -- your email will bounce. This happened to me the other day as I was working with my developer. When my email bounced, I contacted AOL. After doing a mail test or two, the AOL representative said the URL in my email was being blocked "because we believe it to be a morpher." A morpher you say?? Indeed. Turns out AOL is blocking certain CJ URLs in emails to AOL members due to the fact that the destination URL constantly changes. Commission Junction has approximately 1,500 merchants so its pool of 5 URL must be changing a bunch with publisher ID's redirecting visitors to hundreds of product and service offerings. Could this impact indexing of URL's in search result pages for affiliates using CJ links? What should you do? Nothing for now. AOL hasn't made any formal announcements nor have websites we monitor been impacted: http://www.for-sale-now.com GoYaMi will keep monitoring this issue for you, and if any new information breaks we'll keep you updated. Todd Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Search Stocks Drop --Findwhat trying to find bottom
Huge bummer if you were holding FWHT yesterday as the stock tanked on flat earning. Nice overview piece by Reuters is provided below. Have a great weekend Todd UPDATE 2-Growth, pricing fears roil Web search stocks NEW YORK, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Shares in Internet advertising companies and search engines dropped sharply on Thursday, as investors worried about growth and weaker Web search pricing. Online ad leaders Google Inc. (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research) and Yahoo Inc. (YHOO.O: Quote, Profile, Research) saw their shares fall more than 4 percent on the Nasdaq after one investment bank downgraded ratings for both companies on Thursday. FindWhat.com (FWHT.O: Quote, Profile, Research) slipped more than 21 percent after reporting flat earnings on Wednesday and search engine Ask Jeeves Inc. (ASKJ.O: Quote, Profile, Research) dropped more than 8 percent. U.S. Internet ad spending is expected to rise up to 25 percent this year as marketers move more budgets online. But some investors are concerned the breakneck expansion of online advertising over the last two years will slow in 2005, affecting growth at Google, Yahoo and their smaller rivals. RBC Capital Markets on Thursday cut Yahoo's investment rating to "sector perform" from "outperform" and trimmed its price target to $34 from $43. Google's rating was reduced to "sector perform" from "top pick" and its price target dropped to $200 from $250. RBC analyst Jordan Rohan said both companies were seeing keyword prices drop in the double digits on a quarterly basis as advertisers strike harder bargains. He also noted high market valuations for both companies, with Google trading at more than 49 times projected 2005 earnings and Yahoo at nearly 66 times earnings this year. Increased anxiety over the downgrades spilled over into the options market, where volumes were heavier than usual for both Google and Yahoo. "The downgrade in Google brought down the prospect of future growth rates for the company," said Tim Biggam, chief options strategist at Man Financial. "Although Yahoo is down, options players are expressing more concern and are willing to pay more for puts and calls, pushing up volatility. ONLINE AD SPENDING SEEN STRONG The downgrade also followed a joint report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers that lowered their estimate for third-quarter Internet ad spending to $2.3 billion from a previous estimate of $2.4 billion as more accurate spending data became available. Peter Petrusky, director of advisory services at PricewaterhouseCoopers, noted that online ad spending has been growing steadily to about $9.6 billion last year. Though the rate of increase would be expected to diminish as the base of comparison grows larger, that shouldn't spark fears over individual companies, he said. Other analysts also view the share declines as temporary. Online ad spending will remain strong in the United States and has room to grow dramatically overseas, said David Garrity of Caris & Company. "Corporate advertisers are having trouble staying in touch with their mass markets these days," Garrity said. "There are very few alternatives and the best one you and I can probably think of is paid online search." Garrity expected any weakness in paid search listing prices to be temporary and said FindWhat.com and Ask Jeeves may have been more aggressive on pricing as they fought for market share. He reiterated a "buy" rating on Yahoo and an "above average" rating on Google. Google closed $5.06 lower at $188.89. Yahoo fell 64 cents to $31.48, FindWhat dropped $2.50 to $10.95, while Ask Jeeves lost $1.48 to $21.77. (Additional reporting by Doris Frankel in Chicago)
Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: February 24, 2005The Top 10 Ways to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program
I recently prepared a presentation for EcomXpo, and thought that Goyami readers might be interested in reading the script. The goal of the presentation was to give a PPC Super Affiliate perspective on what affiliate managers can do to drive us away from their program. If you would like to see the slides you may Download the Presentation. The Top 10 Ways to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program Introduction: Super affiliates come in many flavors, so before we get into the Top 10 ways to repel super affiliates, I want to define the specific type of super affiliate I am talking about. More and more of companys top affiliates are those that successfully leverage pay-per-click advertising to drive traffic to your companys programs. These pay-per-click search affiliates, also known as search arbitragers, risk their own money every day to buy pay-per-click advertising betting that the companies they have partnered with can convert that traffic into commissionable events on their site which will earn them more than the cost of their ads. These super affiliates spend a lot of time building keyword lists and often send traffic from their search engine ads directly to the merchants site without ever landing on a site of their own. Some of these affiliates do this on a part-time basis and continue to keep their day jobs, and they often test a lot of companys programs across many industries to see which ones will convert the best. As I prepare this presentation, Google has just recently announced their new affiliate policy of only allowing one ad per url in their searches. Undoubtedly, these super affiliates, like myself, are working hard to adjust their efforts to work within these new rules. So without further a-doo, lets get into the top 10 ways to repel these super affiliates from your program.
I hear affiliate managers struggling with this question all the time, how should the communicate with their top affiliates? Should they call their top affiliates on the phone or wait for them to call? Well, some affiliates have full-time jobs, and may not be able to talk on the phone. Before I started focusing on this full-time, I sat in a cube-farm with my boss in the next cube. Talking on the phone wasnt an easy option for me during the day. What about email? Since affiliates may join hundreds of programs, they get a lot of newsletters. I had to setup a separate email box just for the newsletters which I hardly ever read. Right now, I have over 2 thousand un-read messages in that mailbox for only 3 months worth of messages. I have filters setup to highlight messages that come into that box that I might not want to miss. The partners that I communicate with via email have learned that adam@imwave.com is my 2-way communication email box, and partners@imwave.com (the one I have registered with) is not. For me, AOL instant messenger is my preferred form of communications, it lets me contact partners when I need them, and allows partners to contact me when they need me. Finally, I get very few postal mail communications from merchants. This is probably the best way to reach potential affiliates who are either not in your program or who have joined and are not active yet. A quick welcome to the program postcard might go a long way. Ebay sent out a flyer about how one of their affiliates earned over 1 million in one month, and that sparked my interest in their program, now I am one of their top affiliates. Sad to say, I have not yet earned a million in 1 month. The bottom line here, is that there is no 1 best way to communicate with your top partners, you need to learn what their favored form of communication is and adapt.
How often do you non-active affiliates from your list? Some affiliates will sign up for all the programs in a specific network so that when they are ready to run a test they will already be a member. Does purging affiliates really save that much time in reporting and communicating? An affiliate who took the time to sign-up for your program could have great potential, affiliates belong to far more programs than they market today, please dont purge us. If you must purge your list, be sure not to do it before your busy season, I had one costume site purge me right before Halloween.
How often do you send out coupon codes to your affiliates? Are these codes ones that customers must enter during the checkout process? If a search arbitrager is linking to your site directly from a Google ad, there is very little chance the affiliate has room to communicate the code, and even less chance that if they did the customer would remember to type it in. Coupons may be a great way to drive sales on your site though, so how can they work for arbitragers? A better option would be to provide a landing page that sells the customer and promotes the coupon code, the best option would be to embed the code in the link, so that the customers dont have to do anything but click on the ad and the offer detailed on the landing page, and is automatically included when they check out. It is important to mention the offer on the landing page, Google requires that any offer referenced in the ad must be available within 1 click on the landing page, otherwise the ads will be disabled.
How often do affiliates have to change their Ads for your program? If you make a change that breaks old links, typical website affiliates might just have a broken link on their site, but pay-per-click affiliates may be paying to drive traffic to error pages which will cost them money with each click to an error page. Google determines the ranking of an ad based on the amount the affiliate is willing to pay per click as well as the click through rate of the ad for that specific keyword term. As ads are run over time, they build up position for important keywords, and if the ads are modified in any way, Google considers these ads new, and affiliates may have to pay more to maintain their ranking or risk driving less traffic and generating less sales. Always do what you can to make asking affiliates to change their ads, the last resort.
Understanding your affiliates financial model is critical to the success of any program. How do you determine how much you are going to pay affiliates? You need to know their metrics before you should answer this question. Pay-Per-Click Search affiliate pay for every click and often lose money. That is important, so let me repeat it. THEY OFTEN LOSE MONEY. These affiliates will often test a lot of programs to see which ones will have the best return per click. There are typically 3 possible outcomes of a test:
There are really 3 key variables that determine the revenue per click, two of which are more controlled by the merchant and one in direct control of the affiliate. The merchant controls the amount of commission they are willing to pay and what the customers experience when they reach the merchants site, which results in a conversion rate of the traffic that the affiliate sends. Affiliates control how much they are willing to pay per click. The amount that the affiliate makes per click is equal to the commission rate times the conversion rate percentage, less the cost per click. Lets look at an example Lets assume the merchant pays a hefty 25% of sales (I have seen this rate marketed in Revenue Magazine by companies looking for new affiliates). Also lets say the merchants average order size is $100. This means that if the customer buys they affiliate can expect to make roughly $25 per transaction. The merchants site isnt great, and they are only converting about 1% of visitors to sales, but the category is fairly popular and the affiliate feels they need to bid 35 cents per click to generate traffic on their keywords. When you multiply the $25 by the 1% conversion rate, you can see that the affiliate is making only 25 cents per click, so they can expect to lose 10 cents on every click. Nice rate, but bad return. This merchant either needs to drastically improve their conversion rates or pay a lot more in commissions to make the relationship work. Merchants must do the math, and understand these metrics to make sure affiliates have room to bid and be profitable.
Pop-up ads can be an effective way for merchants to drive more sales and promote new features to their customers, but can have a drastic affect on your pay-per-click search affiliates. If the landing pages you allow your affiliates to link to have pop-ups your affiliates paid ads are going to get disabled. Pop-ups include any additional browser window that opens when the customer enters or exits the landing page. Pop-ups are often implemented to promote customer surveys and seasonal promotions. If you feel must use a pop-up to promote your business please consider landing pages without pop-ups for search affiliates. Make sure these are clearly labeled and that you communicate well that they are available, because a search affiliate might just check the first ad to see if there is a pop-up, and if there is they might move on and never return. Consider providing a parameter that affiliates can pass in the affiliate link to your site that disables the pop-up ad. Finally, you might be able to accomplish the same result using DHTML overlays on your site instead of pop-ups, this would allow messages to appear on top of your page without triggering pop-up blockers or getting your affiliates ads disabled.
Some merchants allow affiliates to link directly to their site via affiliate links, but have a policy of not allowing affiliates to use their domain name in the display url of their ads. This can confuse customers because they see one URL in the ad, but end up somewhere else. This policy often is a pre-courser for not allowing affiliates to link directly to the merchants site and forcing them to build their own site to market the company or abandon the companys program all together. Finally, Google has a policy that display urls must match the landing page url, so this policy often forces pay-per-click search affiliates to market for your competition.
Some merchants do not allow affiliates to bid on the companies name. I have found that bidding on a companies name and variations of their name often provide me a good indication of how well the site can convert traffic. If the site cant sell people who are typing their name into a search engine, than they wont convert any of the other more generic keyword traffic I could send them. As you saw in the metrics, promoting a site with a poor conversion rate can cost an affiliate a lot of money. Additionally, many merchants have used affiliates bidding on their trademarks as a way to block competitors ads on those marks from appearing on the first screen. With the Geico decision and Googles new single ad per url policy in place, it will be harder and harder for companies to keep competitors from bidding on their names. Working with top affiliates creatively here could be very important. Finally, if you must have a no trademark bidding policy, be specific and give affiliates a specific list of terms that they are not allowed to bid on. Also, when you make this list be smart and dont include generic terms, even if they are part of your name, because you can bet your competitors and their affiliates will be bidding on those generic terms.
Some merchants have adopted a policy of not only preventing affiliates from bidding on their trademarks directly, but preventing them from accidentally showing up under these terms indirectly. An example of this would be if you were one of the top flower companies on the Internet, and your affiliates might not be able to bid on the term flowers because the search engines might match the term flowers with keyword searches for your brand name, pro flowers, 1-800-flowers, or flowers direct. The only way an affiliate could bid on these terms would be to implement a specific list of negative terms that their ads are not allowed to show for. If you adopt this type of policy, and your competitors dont, their affiliates ads will show up on your terms even though they are not bidding on them directly. And the Number 1 Way to Repel Super Affiliates from your Program? Number 1: Not Understanding the Technology Remember your policies have to work with the current technology, and some policies can have un-foreseen consequences. For example: I have recently seen more and more default trademark policy language on Commission Junctions merchants preventing direct and indirect bidding on companies marks and misspelled variations. The technological consequence of this is that pay-per-click affiliates who decide to participate in the program can not bid on any term using broad or phrased match, because it is impossible for them to ad negative terms for every misspelled possibility, especially when Overture only allows 15 negative terms. The technical result of not allowing affiliates to use the company domain in their display url is disabled ads or poor user experience. The technical result of putting pop-up ads on your site, is disabling existing pay-per-click affiliates ads and new affiliates never running tests to see if they want to market your program. The technical result of asking affiliates to change their ads is affiliates losing rankings in their ads, higher costs for your affiliates and reduced results in your program. Finally, the result of not understanding the technology, is more affiliates marketing for your competition who do understand the technology.
Please feel free to IM (AdamViener) me or email me if you have any questions, I look forward to hearing from you. Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: February 23, 2005Name Development Limited sold for 164.2 Million - Misspelled Domains are Hot
Misspelled and Expired Domain names that get a lot of traffic are becoming hot commodities. As evidenced by two recent transactions. First, Marchex has agreed to pay 164.2 Million for Name Development Ltd., which displays keyword advertising across a portfolio of more than 100,000 domains. With domains like careerinfo.com, debts.com, and hardware-update.com. Name Development Ltd business model has been to buy expiring domains with existing traffic and point them to a parked page provider, like Domainhop and TrafficZ, who are willing to setup a site and pay them on a per-click basis. Companies like Name Development Ltd, use tools such as Popusearch and Mozzle to identify which of the expiring domains have a lot in sites linking to them. Second, the misspelled domain voyuer.com was auctioned off for $112,100 at Snapnames during it's expiration period. The prior owner of Voyuer.com failed to renew the domain name from Network Solutions for $35, and Network Solutions sent the domain into the snapnames auction service to auction it off during the "grace period", the short amount of time after the customer's expiration date but before it was officially dropped by the Registry. In this process, SnapNames, Network Solutions, and the prior owner of the domain, share in the sales proceeds, with 15-20% of Network Solutions' unspecified portion of the sale going to the original registrant. So assuming that Snapnames shares 50%, the original registrant's percentage could be as high as 10% of the overall transaction, or $11,210 for the domain they didn't think was worth the $35 renewal fee. Not bad, but it might hurt a little knowing they could have sold it for the full $112,100. Of course, Network Solutions prominently spells this all out in schedule A section 14 service agreement that is subject to constant change and takes affect 30 days after posting the change to their site. As more and more companies find ways to monetize "surfing traffic", expired domain names could be worth more and more. Additionally, creative affiliates should continue to explore possible domains with traffic that might drive sales to your merchant partners. You can bid up a keyword term all day long, and Google makes more and more money, but a domain name that you purchase can be a long term asset for your company. Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics February 16, 2005eComXpo - Online Tradeshow for Affiliate Marketing
eComXpo is set to kick off tomorrow, and I had a chance to take a sneak preview today. This online tradeshow promises to be a lively event full of tradeshow booths, presentations, prize giveaways, and virtual networking chat rooms. This is the first year that this has been tried, and it looks like it will be a huge success. With hundreds of merchants and thousands of affiliates participating, it's bound to be interesting. Here is a quick screen shot of the main tradeshow exhibit hall:
Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Affiliate Marketing February 14, 2005Happy Valentines Day
The Goyami staff would like to wish everyone a very Happy Valentines Day! In Goyami tradition, we have dug up some of the past Google Valentines day logos:
Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics February 12, 2005Wisconsin Quarter Misprint Errors
Tracking keyword trends with tools such as Wordtracker can be interesting. Yesterday I noticed that the top word being searched for was Wisconsin Quarter. A quick search on Google showed that an NPR article indicated that there was a misprint on some Wisconsin Quarters making an undetermined number of them worth up to $500. That's a great return on investment for a quarter. This should turn into a hot news topic as well as a hot auction item, perfect for online auctions. Comments (9) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics February 11, 2005Affilaites and Merchants Reacting to new Google Policy
It has been almost a month since Google new affiliate marketing policy went into place, and I thought it would be interesting to take a look at how some of the merchants have been reacting. I have seen affiliate managers taking some proactive steps to help their programs continue to thrive. Here are some examples of what I am seeing out there: Merchant Provided Landing Pages Affiliate Created Landing Pages Time Sensitive Sites It is great to see affiliates and merchants working together to overcome the current Google policy change. I am sure I have missed a lot of good examples, please feel free to add a comment to this post and tell us about the other sites you have seen or have created. Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics February 8, 2005Louis Vuitton vs Google
The Parisian District Court has ruled against Google, saying that Google's allowing competitors to run ads triggered by Louis Vuitton's trademark terms was counterfeiting, unfair competition and misleading advertising. The court has ordered Google to pay Louis Vuitton $250,000 and stop displaying ads for Vuitton's competitors whenever users type in the company's name into the search engine. Google said it was still considering whether or not to appeal the ruling. "We're studying the ruling," said Google spokesperson Myriam Boublil. "No decision's been taken yet on an appeal." Only a month ago, Google lost a similar case with Le Meridian Hotels, in which the search engine firm was fined $2,550 and ordered to pay costs. Managing different trademark policies in different countries could prove difficult for Google, and we may see this trigger harder positions on trademark bidding in the US in the near future. Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics Keyword Stock Index?
Paul Kedrosky hypothesizes that there could be a financial model built around the trend in category keyword prices and the stock market segment. Interestingly enough, I have had several calls from investment firms and hedge funds over the past few weeks trying to understand the changing policies of Google and how they might affect companies future revenues and thus stock prices. I agree with Paul, that watching the trends in keyword prices could be a valuable predictor of future stock prices, I would also suggest that as an affiliate marketer that markets across multiple categories, that we may be in a position to understand customer buying behavior and sales conversion trends better than most. For example, British Airways has had a run up on their stock of 15% since December, but this month their conversion rates tanked on the traffic I had been sending them and I lost quite a bit of money. Could that be a predictor that British Airways is going to have a stock slide? Prices in keywords could be a good predictor, but tracking the trends in site conversion rates could be even better. Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News February 7, 2005Welcome to the Search Wars
Microsoft has recently launched their new search engine and already pundits are questioning the amount of advertising for each search. The bulk of the latest release revolves around Microsoft using it's own spider to identify relevant organic search results, brining MSN Search one step closer to owning 100% of their product. On the paid search side, they are still running the bulk of their pay-per-click ads through Overture. Recently they extended their deal with overture until June of 2006. Besides using Overture's paid search, MSN also offers up to 3 available spots on any search for featured sites willing to pay a minimum of $75,000 per year. When you look at these moves and Microsoft's recent aggressive use of head hunters to build up their own internal search department, it clearly spells that Microsoft is targeting their full force behind search. I think we will quickly see search being an embedded feature of the next operating system and quickly Microsoft will replay the browser wars on the search space. Authoritative rumors have it that Google turned down a Microsoft buy-out proposal prior to the Google IPO. It will be interesting to watch how the search war plays out and if Google can do better than Netscape did in the Browser war. Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News February 3, 2005Google Adwords Keyword Hijacking
Recent reports indicate that unscrupulous folks in Cyberspace may be using the Google AdWords "feature" of disabling keywords that don't get clicked to their own advantage. By running programs that do a lot of searches on a specific term, they can get their competitor's ads disabled, and allow them to gain top ad positions and lower rates. This will be an interesting development to watch.
Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: ! Hot Topics February 2, 2005Google on the Move
Google has been on the move recently, a 7 Fold rise in net profit surprised Wall Street sending the stock up 14 points today. A little more quietly, Google has become an ICANN registered registrar which will allow them to start selling domain names. There is a lot of speculation about what they will do with this status. The most obvious fit would be to offer cheap domain names as an up sell to their blogger and gmail services. Some have speculated that this could be a move towards the hosting market. Finally, Google has announced a new beta API interface to their Adwords product that will enable creative programmers to provide add on services and let savvy marketers gain better control over their Adwords advertising. It will be fun to watch as new 3rd party services hit the market. Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: SEM Company & Industry News
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||